Submissions
Original Research Article
Introduction, Materials and methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusions, Acknowledgments, References. Tables and figures embedded within the text.
Didactic experiences developed and investigated with empirical work
Letters to the Editor/Commentaries, Technical reports, Case studies, Pedagogical experiences, Doctoral dissertations, Conference proceedings and Book reviews: prepare de main body of the text using as many sections as required to present the topic
Theoretical systematic reviews and/or meta-analysis
Introduction, Background, Main body (include Methods when reporting meta-analysis), Conclusions, Practical application, Future research, Acknowledgments, References, Tables and Figures.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. There are no page charges for publications in this journal. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.
Privacy Statement
In accordance with the provisions of Article 5 from Organic Law 15/1999, dated 13th December, concerning the Protection of Personal Data, we wish to inform you that personal information provided to the journals to which FECYT provides access is included in a file belonging to the journal “Retos”. It is possible to check each journal’s purpose in the section “about/contact”.
We also inform you that FECYT acts as data processor for each of the files owned by the journals. Thereof, FECYT facilitates the exercise of your rights of access, rectification, cancellation and opposition, according to the terms described in Spanish Law on the Protection of Personal Data, by contacting the Spanish Foundation for Science and Technology headquarters located at C/ Pintor Velázquez nº 5 - Edificio Museo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, 28100 Alcobendas (Madrid).
Disclaimer and privacy policy available following this link
Names and E-mail addresses entered in esta magazine is exclusively used for The fines declared for this magazine and Upgrade keychain Other Purposes any paragraph or other person.
This journal welcomes the Code of Conduct Ethics Committee Publications COPE / Commitee on Publication Ethics, COPE
Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement
All manuscripts submitted to Retos must observe international ethics regulations. We follow the ethics principles outlined by the Committee of Publications Ethics (COPE, http://publicationethics.org), and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE, http://www.icmje.org).
Publication and authorship
- All submitted papers are subject to strict peer-review process by reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular manuscript.
- The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance and originality.
- The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
- If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
- Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
- The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
- No research can be included in more than one publication.
Authors' responsibilities
1. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. We are particularly sensitive to plagiarism or self-plagiarism. Articles with plagiarism equal to or greater than 15% will be rejected, excluding references. Reviewers will use different programs to detect plagiarism throughout the text evaluation process. Authors who infringe this aspect will be sanctioned with a five-year ban from submitting articles to the Retos journal. Authors who have used artificial intelligence must indicate which applications and in which processes and sections they have been used. Likewise, all articles published by the author(s) involved will be withdrawn.
2. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not been previously published elsewhere.
3. Authors must certify that the manuscript is not being considered for publication elsewhere.
4. Authors must participate in the peer review process; that is, they are responsible for responding to the observations, suggestions and comments of the manuscript evaluators. 5. Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of errors.
6. All authors mentioned in the paper must have contributed significantly to the research. It will not be possible to add collaborators/authors once the submission has been made.
7. Authors must declare that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
8. Authors must notify the editors of any conflict of interest.
9. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript and not include references that are not related to the topic of the article or the context in which they are cited.
10. Authors must report any errors they discover in their published article to the Editors.
11. Authors are aware of the publication fee for a normal review which can be found here: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/Cuota Therefore, they agree to pay it in the event that the article is accepted.
Reviewers' responsibilities
- Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information.
- Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author
- Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments
- Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
- Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
- Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Editors' responsibilities
- Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
- Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
- Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.
- Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
- Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
- Editors should have a clear picture of a research's funding sources.
- Editors should base their decisions solely one the papers' importance, originality, clarity and relevance to publication's scope.
- Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason.
- Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers.
- Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
- Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
- Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
- Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions, they should have proof of misconduct.
- Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board members.
- Editorial decisions are made on the basis of academic merit and are not affected by the origin of the manuscript, including the nationality, ethnicity, political beliefs, race or religion of the authors.