Motion-based technology uses sensors and the internet of things to support badminton motor skills examination
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v67.109852Keywords:
Eligibility, Instruments, Skills, Agility, Speed, BadmintonAbstract
Background: Motor skills, particularly agility and speed, are essential in badminton, yet a suitable test instrument remains lacking. Integrating Internet of Things (IoT) technology offers a precise and efficient solution for measurement. This study aims to develop an IoT-integrated badminton motor skills test instrument.
Objectives: (1) Develop IoT-based badminton skill test instruments and (2) Assess their feasibility.
Methods: This Research and Development (R&D) study follows a 4D model (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate). The define stage includes needs analysis through field observation and literature review. The design stage involves developing an IoT-based agility and speed test instrument. The development stage focuses on prototyping and testing validity and reliability, while the dissemination stage involves implementation and evaluation.
Results: The define and design stages have been completed, confirming the need for IoT-integrated agility and speed test instruments for badminton. The designed agility test includes six sensor points across the court, while the speed test employs start and finish sensors. Both instruments feature monitors for control and result display.
Conclusion: This study successfully designed an IoT-based test instrument, with future work focusing on prototype development and feasibility testing. This innovation could revolutionize badminton motor skill assessment, improving athlete performance evaluation using modern technology.
References
Abián, P., Castanedo, A., Feng, X. Q., Sampedro, J., & Abian-Vicen, J. (2014). Notational comparison of men's singles badminton matches between Olympic Games in Beijing and London. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 14(1), 42-53.
Abian-Vicen, J., Castanedo, A., Abian, P., & Sampedro, J. (2013). Temporal and notational comparison of badminton matches between men's singles and women's singles. International Journal of Per-formance Analysis in Sport, 13(2), 310-320.
Alja'am, J. M., El-Seoud, S. A., & Mwinyi, M. U. (2017). Design and implementation of a multimedia-based technology solution to assist children with intellectual disability to learn. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(4), 202-217.
Asuman, B., Khan, M. S. H., & Clement, C. K. (2018). Integration of web-based learning into higher educa-tion institutions in Uganda: Teachers' perspectives. International Journal of Web-Based Learn-ing and Teaching Technologies, 13(3), 33-50.
Bakhtiar, S., Famelia, R., Goodway, J. D., & Kiram, Y. (2015). A needs assessment of the fundamental motor skills of urban and rural children in Indonesia. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 37(3), S72-S72.
Barreira, J., Chiminazzo, J. G. C., & Fernandes, P. T. (2016). Analysis of point difference established by winners and losers in games of badminton. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 16(2), 687-694.
Cabello, D., Padial, P., Lees, A., & Rivas, F. (2004). Temporal and physiological characteristics of elite women's and men's singles badminton. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences, 16(2), 1-12.
Chow, J. Y., Seifert, L., Hérault, R., Chia, S. J. Y., & Lee, M. C. Y. (2014). A dynamical system perspective to understanding badminton singles game play. Human Movement Science, 33(1), 70-84.
de Bruijn, A. G. M., Kostons, D. D. N. M., van der Fels, I. M. J., Visscher, C., Oosterlaan, J., Hartman, E., & Bosker, R. J. (2019). Importance of aerobic fitness and fundamental motor skills for academic achievement. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 43, 200-209.
EMS, T. (2014). PHP-MySQL theory and practice for Beginners. Elex Media Komputindo.
Gawin, W., Beyer, C., & Seidler, M. (2015). A competition analysis of the single and double disciplines in world-class badminton. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 15(3), 997-1006.
Haywood, K. M., Roberton, M. A., & Getchell, N. (2012). Advanced analysis of motor development. Hu-man Kinetics.
Hidayat, R., & Setiawan, R. (2017). Design of a Website and Cellular-Based Sports Facilities Mapping Application (PSO) as Information for Mapping Sports Facilities. Journal of Informatics Educa-tion and Research (JEPIN), 3(1), 28-33.
Hughes, M., Hughes, T. M., & Behan, H. (2008). The evolution of computerised notational analysis through the example of racket sports. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sports Science, 10(3), 1-22.
Kiram, Y. (2016). Learning Motor Skills (Revised Edition). UNP Press.
Laffaye, G., Phomsoupha, M., & Dor, F. (2015). Changes in the game characteristics of a badminton match: A longitudinal study through the olympic game finals analysis in men's singles. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 14(3), 584-590.
Lees, A. (2003). Science and the major racket sports: A review. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21(9), 707-732.
Lima, R. A., Bugge, A., Ersbøll, A. K., Stodden, D. F., & Andersen, L. B. (2019). The longitudinal relation-ship between motor competence and measures of fatness and fitness from childhood into ado-lescence. Jornal de Pediatria, 95(4), 482-488.
Ozdamli, F. (2017). Attitudes and opinions of special education candidate teachers regarding digital technology. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 9(4), 191-200.
Phomsoupha, M., & Laffaye, G. (2015). The science of badminton: Game characteristics, anthropome-try, physiology, visual fitness and biomechanics. Sports Medicine, 45(4), 473-495.
Pretto, G., & Curró, G. (2017). An approach for doctoral students conducting context-specific review of literature in IT, ICT, and educational technology. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 23(1), 60-83.
Salleh, S., & Laxman, K. (2015). Examining the effect of external factors and context-dependent beliefs of teachers in the use of ICT in teaching using an elaborated theory of planned behavior. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 43(3), 289-319.
Selay, A., Andigha, G. D., Alfarizi, A., Wahyudi, M. I. B., Falah, M. N., & Khaira, M. (2022). Internet of Things. Karimah Tauhid, 1(6), 860-868.
Seth, B. (2016). Determination factors of badminton game performance. International Journal of Phys-ical Education, Sports and Health, 3(1), 20-22.
Setiawan, Y., Tanudjaja, H., & Octaviani, S. (2019). The Use of the Internet of Things (IoT) for Monitor-ing and Control of Hydroponic Systems. TESLA: Journal of Electrical Engineering, 20(2), 175-180.
Sgrò, F., Schembri, R., Nicolosi, S., Manzo, G., & Lipoma, M. (2013). A mixed-method approach for the assessment of fundamental movement skills in physical education. Procedia-Social and Behav-ioral Sciences, 106, 102-111.
Specht, M. (2014). Sensor technology for learning support. Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 16(2-3), 2-4.
Valldecabres, R., de Benito, A. M., Casal, C. A., & Pablos, C. (2017). 2015 Badminton World Champion-ship: Singles final men's vs women's behaviours. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 12(Proc3), S807-S815.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sigit Nugroho, Anton Komaini, Muhammad Wahyu Arga, Fadli Ihsan, Rezha Arzhan Hidayat, Slamet Raharjo, Agus Rusdiana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.
