Shooting effectiveness after offensive rebound and its impact on team success in 3x3 basketball
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v62.109199Keywords:
team sports, accuracy, statistical analysis, games, performanceAbstract
The purpose of our research was to investigate the shotting effectiveness in 3x3 basketball after an offensive rebound. A total of 16,136 possessions corresponding to 350 games across 18 different competitions, were analysed. The variables collected were as follows: (1) shot at the basket after offensive rebound; (2) shooting effectiveness after offensive rebound; (3) shooting zone; (4) scoring zone. Statistical analyses included series of binomial logistic regression analyses. The results of this study show that the middle area of the arc is regularly used by both winning and losing teams in terms of successful attempts and total shots made. Shooting effectiveness increases when shooting after offensive rebound (OR= 1.51; p<0.001) and winning teams exhibited a higher number of total shooting attempts (OR= 1.26; p<0.001). Moreover, winning teams were more effective after offensive rebound compared to losers (OR= 1.27; p= 0.015). For 3x3 teams, offensive rebounding constitutes a crucial component in increasing scoring opportunities. Furthermore, the location of the shot, exerts a noticeable impact on scoring effectiveness.
References
Andrianova, R. I., Guimarães, E., Fedoseev, D. V., & Isakov, M. (2022). Specific features of 3×3 basketball: factor analysis of the key performance indicators and their impact on game performance in the elite leagues. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 22(10), 2575–2581. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2022.10326
Anguera, M. T. (2003). La observación. In Sanz y Torres (Ed.), Evaluación psicológica. Concepto, proceso y aplicación en las áreas del desarrollo y de la inteligencia (pp. 271–308).
Boros, Z., Toth, K., Csurilla, G., & Sterbenz, T. (2022). A Comparison of 5v5 and 3x3 Men’s Basketball Regarding Shot Selection and Efficiency. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215137
Čaušević, D. (2015). Game-Related Statistics That Discriminate Winning and Losing Teams From the World Championships in Spain in 2014. Homo Sporticus, 17(2), 16–19.
Christmann, J., Akamphuber, M., Müllenbach, A. L., & Güllich, A. (2018). Crunch time in the NBA – The effectiveness of different play types in the endgame of close matches in professional basketball. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 13(6), 1090–1099. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954118772485
Conte, D., & Lukonaitiene, I. (2018). Scoring strategies differentiating between winning and losing teams during fiba eurobasket women 2017. Sports, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/sports6020050
Conte, D., Tessitore, A., Gjullin, A., Mackinnon, D., Lupo, C., & Favero, T. (2018). Investigating the game-related statistics and tactical profile in NCAA division I men’s basketball games. Biology of Sport, 35(2), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2018.71602
Courel, J., SuÁrez, E., Ortega, E., Piñar, M., & CÁrdenas, D. (2013). Is the inside pass a performance indicator? Observational analysis of elite basketball teams. Revista de Psicologia Del Deporte, 22(1), 191–194.
Csátaljay, G., James, N., Hughes, M., & Dancs, H. (2017). Analysis of influencing factors behind offensive rebounding performance in elite basketball. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 12(6), 774–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954117738900
Csataljay, G., O’Donoghue, P., Hughes, M., & Dancs, H. (2009). Performance indicators that distinguish winning and losing teams in basketball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 9(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2009.11868464
de Almeida, M. B., Canuto, S. C., Lima, G. S., & Oliveira, W. G. (2022). Performance Analysis in Elite Basketball Differentiating Game Outcome And Gender. European Journal of Human Movement, 49, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.21134/eurjhm.2022.49.7
Erčulj, F., Vidic, M., & Leskošek, B. (2020). Shooting efficiency and structure of shooting in 3 × 3 basketball compared to 5v5 basketball. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 15(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954119887722
Evangelos, T., & Nikolaos, A. (2004). Registration of rebound possession zones in basketball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 4(1), 34–39. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2004.11868289
Ferioli, D., Conte, D., Rucco, D., Alcaraz, P., Vaquera, A., Romagnoli, M., & Rampinini, E. (2023). Physical Demands of Elite Male and Female 3 × 3 International Basketball. J Strength Cond Res., 37(4), e289–e296. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004338
García, J., Ibáñez, S. J., De Santos, R. M., Leite, N., & Sampaio, J. (2013). Identifying basketball performance indicators in regular season and playoff games. Journal of Human Kinetics, 36(1), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2013-0016
Gómez, M A, Lorenzo, A., Ibañez, S. J., & Sampaio, J. (2013). Ball possession effectiveness in men’s and women’s elite basketball according to situational variables in different game periods. Journal of Sports Sciences, 31(14), 1578–1587. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2013.792942
Gómez, Miguel A, Lorenzo, A., & Barakat, R. (2008). Differences in Game-Related Statistics of Basketball Performance by Game Location for Men’s Winning and Losing Teams. Percept Mot Skills, 106(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.106.1.43-50
Hernández-Beltrán, V., Muñoz-Jiménez, J., Espada, M. C., Castelli Correia de Campos, L. F., & Gamonales, J. M. (2023). Analysis of the basket shot in wheelchair basketball. Retos, 48, 1007–1018. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v48.97205
Hernández-Beltrán, V., Muñoz-Jiménez, J., Gámez-Calvo, L., de Campos, L. F. C. C., & Gamonales, J. M. (2022). Influence of injuries and functional classification on the sport performance in wheelchair basketball players. Systematic review. Retos. Nuevas Tendencias En Educación Física, Deportes y Recreación, 45, 1154–1164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v45i0.94090
Ibáñez, S., Sampaio, J., Feu, S., Lorenzo, A., Gomez, M., & Ortega, E. (2008). Basketball game-related statistics that discriminate between teams’ season-long success. European Journal of Sport Science, 8(6), 369–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461390802261470
Ibáñez, S.J., García, J., Feu, S., Parejo, I., & Cañadas, M. (2009). La eficacia del lanzamiento a canasta en la NBA. Cultura_Ciencia_Deporte, 4(10), 39–47.
Ibáñez, Sergio José, González-Espinosa, S., Feu, S., & García-Rubio, J. (2018). Basketball without borders? Similarities and differences among Continental Basketball Championships. RICYDE: Revista Internacional de Ciencias Del Deporte, 51(14), 42–54. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.5232/ricyde2018.05104 RICYDE.
Madarame, H. (2023). Age and Sex Differences in Shot Distribution and Accuracy in International 3x3 Basketball Tournaments. Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 19(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.26773/mjssm.230302
Malarranha, J., Figueira, B., Leite, N., & Sampaio, J. (2013). Dynamic modeling of performance in basketball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 13(2), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2013.11868655
Matulaitis, K., & Bietkis, T. (2021). Prediction of offensive possession ends in elite basketball teams. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031083
Mejia, N. F. M., & Pérez, B. Z. (2021). Internal structure of the motor coordination of foot movements in attack of basketball. Retos. Nuevas Tendencias En Educación Física, Deportes y Recreación, 42, 813–820. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v42i0.8851
Mexas, K., Tsitskaris, G., Kyriakou, D., & Garefis, A. (2005). Comparison of effectiveness of organized offences between two different championships in high level basketball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 5(1), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2005.11868317
Oliver, D. (2004). Basketball on paper. Rules and Tools for performance analysis. Brassey’s, Inc.
Ortega, E., & Gómez, M. (2009). Metodologia observacional en baloncesto de formacion. Diego Marin Librero Editor,S.L.
Reina, M., García Rubio, J., Antúnez, A., & Ibáñez, S. J. (2020). Comparación de la carga interna y externa en competición oficial de 3 vs. 3 y 5 vs. 5 en baloncesto femenino (Comparison of internal and external load in official 3 vs. 3 and 5 vs. 5 female basketball competitions). Retos, 37, 400–405. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v37i37.73720
Sampaio, J., Drinkwater, E. J., & Leite, N. M. (2010). Effects of season period, team quality, and playing time on basketball players’ game-related statistics. European Journal of Sport Science, 10(2), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461390903311935
Sampaio, J., Janeira, M., Ibáñez, S., & Lorenzo, A. (2006). Discriminant analysis of game-related statistics between basketball guards, forwards and centres in three professional leagues. European Journal of Sport Science, 6(3), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461390600676200
Snoj, L. (2021). 3x3 basketball: everything you need to know. Meyer & Meyer Sport.
Suárez-Cadenas, E., & Courel-Ibáñez, J. (2017). Shooting strategies and effectiveness after offensive rebound and its impact on game result in Euroleague basketball teams. Cuadernos de Psicología Del Deporte, 17(3), 217–222. http://ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=sph&AN=126949738&login.asp&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Suárez-Cadenas, E., Courel-Ibáñez, J., Cárdenas, D., & Perales, J. C. (2016). Towards a Decision Quality Model for Shot Selection in Basketball: An Exploratory Study. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19(October 2017), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2016.53
Trninić, S., Dizdar, D., & Lukšić, E. (2002). Differences between winning and defeated top quality basketball teams in final tournaments of european club championship. Collegium Antropologicum, 26(2), 521–531.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Retos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.
