Melhore o pensamento reflexivo dos alunos através do jogo ao ar livre e da aprendizagem contextual baseada em jogos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v62.109379Palavras-chave:
brincadeiras e jogos, aprendizagem contextual, pensamento reflexivoResumo
A integração dos aspetos cognitivos, afetivos, físicos e sociais da aprendizagem ajuda a introduzir novas ideias e a consolidar o pensamento existente. Os jogos e as brincadeiras podem melhorar as competências de pensamento reflexivo na educação matemática. Os jogos no ensino da matemática contribuem para o desenvolvimento cognitivo e fornecem estratégias de aprendizagem dinâmicas. O pensamento reflexivo é uma das competências essenciais que os estudantes de matemática devem possuir. Um método para incentivar o pensamento reflexivo é através da aplicação de atividades de aprendizagem contextual ao ar livre. Este estudo tem como objetivo determinar o pensamento reflexivo e os fatores de influência através do jogo e da aprendizagem contextual baseada em jogos. Este método de investigação é descritivo e quantitativo, com disciplinas de até 231 estudantes de matemática determinadas com base numa técnica de amostragem propositada. O instrumento utilizado para a recolha de dados foi o instrumento de pensamento reflexivo desenvolvido por Kember. A análise dos dados foi realizada através da modelação SEM auxiliada pelo SmartPLS. Com base nos resultados da análise dos dados, sabe-se que a compreensão é o indicador mais influente do pensamento reflexivo, com um valor de coeficiente de caminho de 0,404 e uma estatística t > tabela t de 19,430 > 1,653. Enquanto isso, a ação habitual é o indicador com menor influência, com um valor do coeficiente de caminho de 0,129 e uma estatística t > tabela t de 3,818 > 1,653. Além disso, a reflexão crítica e a reflexão têm um efeito significativo com base nos valores do coeficiente de caminho de 0,330 e 0,381, respetivamente. Isto mostra que os quatro indicadores influenciam significativamente o pensamento reflexivo dos alunos professores de matemática.
Referências
Aprela, F. S., Swastika, A., Kholid, M. N., Fitriyani, D., Wulandari, F., & Faelasofi, R. (2024). Analysis of mathematical reflective thinking skills in solving story problems of a three-variable system of linear equations. AIP Conference Pro-ceedings, 2926(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0184467
Bustami, Y., Syafruddin, D., & Afriani, R. (2018). The Implementation of Contextual Learning to Enhance Biology Stu-dents’ Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.11721
Byrd, N. (2021). Reflective reasoning & philosophy. Philosophy Compass, 16(11). https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12786
Ceylan, Ö. (2024). Changes in scientific process skills and reflective thinking skills towards problem-solving of gifted students: a summer school practice. Reflective Practice, 25(3), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2024.2314012
Daher, W., & Baya’a, N. (2012). Characteristics of middle school students learning actions in outdoor mathematical activ-ities with the cellular phone. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 31(3), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrr018
Erdoğan, F. (2020). The relationship between prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ critical thinking skills and reflective thinking skills. Participatory Educational Research, 7(1), 220–241. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.13.7.1
Fauzan, A., & Arnawa, I. M. (2020). Designing Mathematics Learning Models Based on Realistic Mathematics Education and Literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1471(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1471/1/012055
Firat, Z. S., & Dinçer, F. Ç. (2024). An Action Research on the Development of the Reflective Thinking Skills of Preserv-ice Preschool Teachers*. Systemic Practice and Action Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-024-09680-4
Fynes-Clinton, E., Burgh, G., & Thornton, S. (2024). Toward a self-correcting society: Deep reflective thinking as a theo-ry of practice. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 11(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.46707/jps.v11i1.217
Hammad, A.-R., & Aberash, A. (2024). Reflective thinking and self-evaluation in language learning: mirroring the im-pacts on Saudi Arabian EFL students’ growth mindfulness, resilience, and academic well-being. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00265-1
Hamzah, N., Zakaria, N., Ariffin, A., & Rubani, S. N. K. (2024). The Effectiveness of Collaborative Learning in Improv-ing Higher Level Thinking Skills and Reflective Skills. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 42(1), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.42.1.191198
Hasanah, S., & Retnawati, H. (2022). Assessment of contextual learning in mathematics education. AIP Conference Proceed-ings, 2575. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0111142
Jiménez-Maldonado, A., Rentería, I., García-Suárez, P. C., Moncada-Jiménez, J., & Freire-Royes, L. F. (2018). The Im-pact of High-Intensity Interval Training on Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Brain: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00839
Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P., Jones, A., Loke, A. Y., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., Tse, H., Webb, C., Wong, F. K. Y., Wong, M., & Yeung, E. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. In Assessment and Eval-uation in Higher Education (Vol. 25, Issue 4, pp. 381–395). https://doi.org/10.1080/713611442
Kholid, M. N., Santosa, Y. T., Toh, T. L., Wijaya, A. P., Sujadi, I., & Hendriana, H. (2024). Defragmenting students’ reflec-tive thinking levels for mathematical problem solving: does it work? Reflective Practice, 25(3), 319–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2024.2320140
Kholid, M. N., Swastika, A., Ishartono, N., Nurcahyo, A., Faiziyah, N., & Nuriyah, Z. T. S. A. (2024). Students’ reflective thinking in parabola problem-solving. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2926(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0182786
Kinghorn, P. F., Millidge, B., & Buckley, C. L. (2021). Habitual and Reflective Control in Hierarchical Predictive Coding (pp. 830–842). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93736-2_59
Laurens, T., Batlolona, F. A., Batlolona, J. R., & Leasa, M. (2018). How does realistic mathematics education (RME) im-prove students’ mathematics cognitive achievement? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 569–578. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/76959
Liline, S., Tomhisa, A., Rumahlatu, D., & Sangur, K. (2024). The Effect of the Pjb-HOTS learning model on cognitive learning, analytical thinking skills, creative thinking skills, and metacognitive skills of biology education students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(1), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.010
Mawla, A. N., & Nurcahyo, A. (2024). Analysis of students’ mathematical reflective thinking ability in algebra problem based on students’ cognitive style. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2926(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0183391
McGuirk, J. (2016). Phenomenological Considerations of Habit: Reason, Knowing and Self-Presence in Habitual Action. Phenomenology and Mind, 6, 112–121.
Ni, N., Roslan, S., Ma’rof, A. M., & Sulaiman, T. (2024). Impact of Smart Classroom Preferences on Critical Thinking Skills of Chinese Pre-Service Teachers: The Role of Moderating Cognitive Learning Strategies. Asian Journal of Univer-sity Education, 20(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v20i1.25742
Nilsson, P., Sollervall, H., & Milrad, M. (2009). Collaborative design of mathematical activities for learning in an outdoor set-ting. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:110148641
Ningrum, A. W., & Murti, R. C. (2023). Contextual Learning Models in Improving Elementary School Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.2360
Orhan, A., & Ataman, O. (2024). Investigating the predictive role of reflective thinking and decision making on creative thinking dispositions. Reflective Practice, 25(2), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2024.2305921
Priyadi, H. G., & Yumiati. (2021). The Effect of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Model With Outdoor Approach Towards the Students’ Ability of Mathematical Representation. Education Quarterly Reviews. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:239175322
Radović, S., Seidel, N., Menze, D., & Kasakowskij, R. (2024). Investigating the effects of different levels of students’ regulation support on learning process and outcome: In search of the optimal level of support for self-regulated learning. Computers and Education, 215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105041
Raub, L. A., Shukor, N. A., Arshad, M. Y., & Rosli, M. S. (2015). An integrated model to implement contextual learning with virtual learning environment for promoting higher order thinking skills in Malaysian secondary schools. Interna-tional Education Studies, 13, 41–46. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n13p41
Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining Reflection: Another Look at John Dewey and Reflective Thinking. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 104(4), 842–866. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810210400402
Samo, D. D. (2019). Higher-order thinking ability among university students: How does culture-based contextual learn-ing with GeoGebra affect it? International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(3), 94–115. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85072629489&partnerID=40&md5=b7b3469b9ace637e928a4f2c9e06b14a
Samo, D. D., & Kartasasmita, B. G. (2018). Culture-based contextual learning to increase problem-solving ability of first year university student. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 81–93. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85059639168&partnerID=40&md5=ccdcc2b3453ec2d581408533d18e28d3
Sari, W. K., & Nada, E. I. (2022). Marzano Taxonomy-Based Assessment Instrument to Measure Analytical and Creative Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 6, 46–54. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v6i1
Saritepeci, M., & Yildiz Durak, H. (2024). Effectiveness of artificial intelligence integration in design-based learning on design thinking mindset, creative and reflective thinking skills: An experimental study. Education and Information Tech-nologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12829-2
Sarwi, S., Marwoto, P., Susilaningsih, E., Lathif, Y. F., & Winarto, W. (2024). Science learning STEM-R approach: A study of students’ reflective and critical thinking. Journal of Education and Learning, 18(2), 462–470. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i2.21080
Selvianiresa, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2017). Contextual Teaching and Learning Approach of Mathematics in Primary Schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895, 012171. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012171
Taylor, E. W. (2017). Critical Reflection and Transformative Learning: A Critical Review. In PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning (Vol. 26).
Thamrin, L., Gustian, U., Suhardi, S., Zhongfulin, W., & Suryadi, D. (2024). The Implementation of Contextual Learning Strategies to Stimulate Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Retos, 53, 52–57. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v53.102501
Tiainen, O., Lutovac, S., & Korkeamäki, R.-L. (2024). Rethinking approaches to reflection in initial teacher education. Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2024.2346088
Tican, C., & Taspinar, M. (2015). The Effects of Reflective Thinking-based Teaching Activities on Pre-service Teachers’ Reflective Thinking Skills, Critical Thinking Skills, Democratic Attitudes, and Academic Achievement. The Anthropolo-gist, 20(1–2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2015.11891730
Titus, A., & Muttungal, P. V. (2024). Reflective thinking in school: a systematic review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(2), 742–751. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i2.26573
Toheri, T., Winarso, W., & Haqq, A. A. (2020). Where Exactly for Enhance Critical and Creative Thinking: The Use of Problem Posing or Contextual Learning. European Journal of Educational Research, volume-9-2020(volume-9-issue-2-april-2020), 877–887. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.877
Toner, J. (2017). Habitual Reflexivity and Skilled Action. Body & Society, 23(4), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X17736371
Ulya, A. R., & Utami, N. S. (2024). Analysis of mathematical reflective thinking skills based on learning interest in straight line equation material. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2926(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0185232
Vlašić, G., Dabić, M., & Krupka, Z. (2024). Cognitive profiles of strategic decision-makers: Implications for explora-tion–exploitation strategies. Strategic Change, 33(4), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2578
Waluya, S. B., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., & Cahyono, A. N. (2024). Construction of reflective thinking: A field independent student in numerical problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp151-172
Warifdah, Y., & Kholid, M. N. (2024). Defragmentation of reflective thinking in solving algebraic problems. AIP Confer-ence Proceedings, 2926(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0182805
Wielgus, M. D. (2015). Critical-reflective thinking: A phenomenology. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:141538487
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2024 Nur Riski Hasanah, Turmudi, Dadang Juandi, Lessa Roesdiana
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e assegurar a revista o direito de ser a primeira publicação da obra como licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite que outros para compartilhar o trabalho com o crédito de autoria do trabalho e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Os autores podem estabelecer acordos adicionais separados para a distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicado na revista (por exemplo, a um repositório institucional, ou publicá-lo em um livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- É permitido e os autores são incentivados a divulgar o seu trabalho por via electrónica (por exemplo, em repositórios institucionais ou no seu próprio site), antes e durante o processo de envio, pois pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como a uma intimação mais Cedo e mais do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) (em Inglês).
Esta revista é a "política de acesso aberto" de Boai (1), apoiando os direitos dos usuários de "ler, baixar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, pesquisar, ou link para os textos completos dos artigos". (1) http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess
