Saúde mental positiva de estudantes do sexo feminino e sua integridade na condução da avaliação por pares: um estudo de método misto
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v68.115953Palavras-chave:
Integridade acadêmica, saúde mental de alunas, avaliação por pares, saúde mental positivaResumo
Introdução: Na prática da avaliação por pares, surgem frequentemente diversos problemas relacionados com a integridade académica entre as alunas de educação física.
Objectivo: O objectivo deste estudo é examinar a relação entre a saúde mental positiva (SMP) e a realização de avaliações por pares com integridade, utilizando uma abordagem de métodos mistos com um desenho sequencial explicativo.
Metodologia: Os dados quantitativos sobre a SMP foram recolhidos junto de 31 alunas, utilizando a Escala de Saúde Mental Positiva, com nove itens, enquanto os dados sobre a integridade académica na avaliação por pares foram obtidos através da Escala de Integridade Académica na Avaliação por Pares, com 24 itens. Foram recolhidos dados qualitativos de seis participantes através de entrevistas semiestruturadas baseadas em seis guiões temáticos, para explorar as experiências das alunas com a SMP para realizar avaliações por pares com integridade.
Resultados: O teste de correlação de Spearman mostrou uma relação positiva e significativa entre o SMP e a integridade da avaliação pelos pares (ρ = 0,634; sig. < 0,001). A análise temática revelou que as experiências relacionadas com a Saúde Mental dos Professores (PMH) que promovem a integridade da avaliação incluem: (1) estimular a motivação através de avaliações construtivas, (2) gerir as emoções face a diversas pressões subjetivas, (3) confiar na própria capacidade de manter a objetividade em todos os momentos e (4) rejeitar compromissos com desvios académicos.
Discussão: Estes resultados realçam a importância de os docentes considerarem o estado de saúde mental das suas alunas antes de lhes permitirem participar em processos de avaliação por pares, de forma a evitar práticas de avaliação carentes de integridade. Conclusões: O reforço da saúde mental positiva pode ser uma estratégia fundamental para melhorar a integridade académica, especialmente no contexto da avaliação por pares.
Referências
Adediwura, A. A. (2012). Effect of peer and self-assessment on male and female students’ self-efficacy and self-autonomy in the learning of mathematics. Gender and Behaviour, 10(1), 4492–4508. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/gab/article/view/76744
Adesina, O. O., Adesina, O. A., Adelopo, I., & Afrifa, G. A. (2023). Managing group work: The impact of peer assessment on student engagement. Accounting Education, 32(1), 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2022.2034023
Aryadoust, V. (2016). Gender and academic major bias in peer assessment of oral presentations. Lan-guage Assessment Quarterly, 13(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2015.1133626
Asgher, S., Khan, F. U., Murtaza, G., Abid, S., Shabbir, M., Ashraf, S., & Munawar, B. (2023). Factors leading students to academic dishonesty on the university level in Pakistan. Journal of Education and Social Studies, 4(3), 836–843. https://doi.org/10.52223/jess.2023.4344
Backman, E., Quennerstedt, M., Tolgfors, B., & Nyberg, G. (2024). Peer assessment in physical education teacher education – a complex process making social and physical capital visible. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 15(3), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2023.2256327
Blegur, J., Ma’mun, A., Berliana, Mahendra, A., Saeful Bakhri, R., & Calunsag, B. D. (2024). Enhancing teaching competence of prospective physical education teachers with integrated learning mod-el. Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 43(3), 588–608. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v43i3.57858
Blegur, J., Subarjah, H., Hidayat, Y., Ma’mun, A., Mahendra, A., Mahardika, I. M. S., & Hardiansyah, S. (2024). Peer-assessment academic integrity scale (PAAIS-24). Emerging Science Journal, 8(2), 513–526. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2024-08-02-09
Blegur, J., Wasak, M. R. P., & Rosari, R. (2019). Student’s self-confidence restoration with peer mentor-ing strategy. European Scientific Journal, 15(19), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2019.v15n19p129
Blegur, J., Wasak, M. R. P., Tlonaen, Z. A., & Manggoa, M. A. (2017). Students’ behaviour of indiscipline syndrome in teaching and learning process. Educational Administration Research and Review, 1(2), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.17509/earr.v1i2.21421
Brown, T., Isbel, S., Logan, A., & Etherington, J. (2020). Predictors of academic integrity in undergradu-ate and graduate-entry masters occupational therapy students. Hong Kong Journal of Occupa-tional Therapy, 33(2), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1569186120968035
Chu, T., Liu, X., Takayanagi, S., Matsushita, T., & Kishimoto, H. (2023). Association between mental health and academic performance among university undergraduates: The interacting role of lifestyle behaviors. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 32(1), e1938. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1938
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods ap-proaches (4th ed.). California: SAGE.
Dancey, C. P., & Reidy, J. (2020). Statistics without maths for psychology (8th ed.). London: Pearson Education.
Daou, D., Sabra, R., & Zgheib, N. K. (2020). Factors that determine the perceived effectiveness of peer feedback in collaborative learning: A mixed methods design. Medical Science Educator, 30(3), 1145–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-00980-7
Diego, L. A. B. (2017). Friends with benefits: Causes and effects of learners’ cheating practices during examination. IAFOR Journal of Education, 5(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.5.2.06
Divecha, H., & Acharya, V. (2024). Perceptions about positive mental health among university students from Southern India: An occupational perspective. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 87(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226231190312
Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3
Eaton, S. E., Pethrick, H., & Turner, K. L. (2023). Academic integrity and student mental well-being: A rapid review. Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity, 5(2), 34–58. https://doi.org/10.11575/cpai.v5i2.73748
Eaton, S. E., & Turner, K. L. (2020). Exploring academic integrity and mental health during COVID-19: Rapid review. Journal of Contemporary Education Theory & Research, 4(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4256825
Espey, M. (2022). Gender and peer evaluations. The Journal of Economic Education, 53(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2021.2004277
Fadillah, S. M., & Ha, M. (2024). Using rubrics to enhance accuracy of peer assessment and self-judgment in biology learning. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 10(2), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10080
Fishman, T. (2014). The fundamental values of academic integrity (2nd ed.). New York: International Center for Academic Integrity.
Gurbanov, E. (2016). The challenge of grading in self and peer-assessment (undergraduate students’ and university teachers’ perspectives). Journal of Education in Black Sea Region, 1(2), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.31578/jebs.v1i2.21
Hyseni Duraku, Z., Davis, H., & Hamiti, E. (2023). Mental health, study skills, social support, and barriers to seeking psychological help among university students: A call for mental health support in higher education. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1220614. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1220614
Iberahim, H., Hussein, N., Samat, N., Noordin, F., & Daud, N. (2013). Academic dishonesty: Why business students participate in these practices? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 152–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.076
International Centre for Academic Integrity. (2021). Fundamental values of academic integrity (3rd ed.). New York: International Centre for Academic Integrity. https://academicintegrity.org/images/pdfs/20019_ICAI-Fundamental-Values_R12.pdf
Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory de-sign: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
Jabbarov, R., Azimzadeh, N., Namazova, G., Abbasova, N., & Guliyev, C. (2024). The impact of mental health on students’ academic performance. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health, 25(S1), 2517–2527. https://doi.org/10.70135/seejph.vi.2488
Jalilzadeh, K., Rashtchi, M., & Mirzapour, F. (2024). Cheating in online assessment: A qualitative study on reasons and coping strategies focusing on EFL teachers’ perceptions. Language Testing in Asia, 14(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-024-00304-1
Khalil, S., Aqil, F., & Jadoon, N. us S. (2024). Role of academic integrity in the relationship between im-poster phenomenon and mental health among university students. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 5(3), 403–410. https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2024(5-III)38
Langan, A. M., Wheater, C. P., Shaw, E. M., Haines, B. J., Cullen, W. R., Boyle, J. C., Penney, D., Oldekop, J. A., Ashcroft, C., Lockey, L., & Preziosi, R. F. (2005). Peer assessment of oral presentations: Effects of student gender, university affiliation and participation in the development of assessment cri-teria. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042003243878
Lester, J. N., Cho, Y., & Lochmiller, C. R. (2020). Learning to do qualitative data analysis: A starting point. Human Resource Development Review, 19(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320903890
Lui, A., & Andrade, H. (2015). Student peer assessment. In Encyclopedia of Science Education (pp. 1003–1005). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0_461
Lukat, J., Margraf, J., Lutz, R., Der Veld, W. M., & Becker, E. S. (2016). Psychometric properties of the positive mental health scale (PMH-scale). BMC Psychology, 4, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0111-x
Mokhtari, M., Dehghan, S. F., Asghari, M., Ghasembaklo, U., Mohamadyari, G., Azadmanesh, S. A., & Akba-ri, E. (2013). Epidemiology of mental health problems in female students: A questionnaire sur-vey. Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health, 3(2), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2013.02.005
Morris, E. J. (2018). Academic integrity matters: Five considerations for addressing contract cheating. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-018-0038-5
Mumpuni, K. E., Priyayi, D. F., & Widoretno, S. (2022). How do students perform a peer assessment? International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 751–766. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15341a
Munni, B. E. (2021). Students’ perspective on peer assessment activities: An investigation into the chal-lenges. Dialogics: A Research Journal of English Studies, 1(1), 163–180. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373439756
Nofziger, A. C., Naumburg, E. H., Davis, B. J., Mooney, C. J., & Epstein, R. M. (2010). Impact of peer as-sessment on the professional development of medical students: A qualitative study. Academic Medicine, 85(1), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c47a5b
Norwich, B., Moore, D., Stentiford, L., & Hall, D. (2022). A critical consideration of ‘mental health and wellbeing’ in education: Thinking about school aims in terms of wellbeing. British Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 803–820. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3795
Ocampo, J. C. G., Panadero, E., & Díez, F. (2023). Are men and women really different? The effects of gender and training on peer scoring and perceptions of peer assessment. Assessment & Evalua-tion in Higher Education, 48(6), 760–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2130167
Ocampo, J. C., Panadero, E., Zamorano, D., Sánchez-Iglesias, I., & Diez Ruiz, F. (2024). The effects of gen-der and training on peer feedback characteristics. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Educa-tion, 49(4), 539–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2286432
Ostafichuk, P. M., & Sibley, J. (2019). Self-bias and gender-bias in student peer evaluation: An expanded study. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.vi0.13864
Panadero, E., Romero, M., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2013). The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer as-sessment: Effects on construct validity, performance, and perceptions of fairness and comfort. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(4), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005
Pérez, M. C. I., Vidal-Puga, J., & Juste, M. R. P. (2022). The role of self and peer assessment in higher edu-cation. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 683–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1783526
Pope, N. K. L. (2005). The impact of stress in self‐ and peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042003243896
Rahmatillah, R., & Fajrita, R. (2022). Analyzing factors affecting the effectiveness of peer assessment in EFL teaching. Indonesian Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 2(2), 82–86. https://doi.org/10.58835/ijtte.v2i2.124
Saana, S. B. B. M., Ablordeppey, E., Mensah, N. J., & Karikari, T. K. (2016). Academic dishonesty in higher education: students’ perceptions and involvement in an African institution. BMC Research Notes, 9(1), 234. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2044-0
Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpreta-tion. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
Shui Ng, W., & Yu, G. (2023). Students’ attitude to peer assessment process: A critical factor for success. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(5), 2967–2985. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1916762
Sousa, F., Alves, T., Gama, S., Jorge, J., & Gonçalves, D. (2024). Studying how social relationships affect peer assessment in an E-learning environment. Learning Environments Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-024-09505-0
Stentiford, L., Koutsouris, G., & Allan, A. (2023). Girls, mental health and academic achievement: A quali-tative systematic review. Educational Review, 75(6), 1224–1254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.2007052
Stonewall, J. H., Dorneich, M. C., & Rongerude, J. (2024). Evaluation of bias in peer assessment in higher education*. International Journal of Engineering Education, 40(3), 543–556. https://www.ijee.ie/1atestissues/Vol40-3/10_ijee4452.pdf
Teixeira, S., Ferré-Grau, C., Canut, T. L., Pires, R., Carvalho, J. C., Ribeiro, I., Sequeira, C., Rodrigues, T., Sampaio, F., Costa, T., & Sequeira, C. A. (2022). Positive mental health in university students and its relations with psychological vulnerability, mental health literacy, and sociodemographic characteristics: A descriptive correlational study. International Journal of Environmental Re-search and Public Health, 19(6), 3185. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063185
Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569
Townsend, M. H., & Bishop Baier, M. (2020). The effect of gender on team-based learning peer assess-ment in a psychiatry clerkship. Medical Science Educator, 30(1), 601–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00819-w
Vaillant, G. E. (2012). Positive mental health: Is there a cross‐cultural definition? World Psychiatry, 11(2), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.05.006
Vakkou, K. Α., Hovardas, T., Xenofontos, N., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2023). Comparing expert and peer assess-ment of pedagogical design in integrated STEAM education. In O. Noroozi & B. De Wever (Eds.), The Power of Peer Learning: Social Interaction in Learning and Development (1st ed., pp. 121–141). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_6
Van Hoe, A., Wiebe, J., Rotsaert, T., & Schellens, T. (2024). The implementation of peer assessment as a scaffold during computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning in secondary STEM educa-tion. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00465-8
Waltzer, T., Samuelson, A., & Dahl, A. (2022). Students’ reasoning about whether to report when others cheat: Conflict, confusion, and consequences. Journal of Academic Ethics, 20(2), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09414-4
Wigati, I., Lestari, W., & Fithriyah, M. (2023). Gender study: Implementation of peer assessment of women’s scientific attitudes in supporting academic achievement on female students in Indo-nesia (Case study at the Indonesian State Islamic University in Palembang). American Journal of Educational Research, 11(9), 562–567. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-11-9-4
Xiao, Y., & Lucking, R. (2008). The impact of two types of peer assessment on students’ performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.005
Zhang, J., Peng, C., & Chen, C. (2024). Mental health and academic performance of college students: Knowledge in the field of mental health, self-control, and learning in college. Acta Psychologica, 248, 104351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104351
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2025 Jusuf Blegur, Andreas J. F. Lumba, Fegie Rizkia Mulyana, Mutmainnah Mutmainnah, Verlanda Yuca, Deasy Yunika Khairun, Atsani Wulansari
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e assegurar a revista o direito de ser a primeira publicação da obra como licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite que outros para compartilhar o trabalho com o crédito de autoria do trabalho e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Os autores podem estabelecer acordos adicionais separados para a distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicado na revista (por exemplo, a um repositório institucional, ou publicá-lo em um livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- É permitido e os autores são incentivados a divulgar o seu trabalho por via electrónica (por exemplo, em repositórios institucionais ou no seu próprio site), antes e durante o processo de envio, pois pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como a uma intimação mais Cedo e mais do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) (em Inglês).
Esta revista é a "política de acesso aberto" de Boai (1), apoiando os direitos dos usuários de "ler, baixar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, pesquisar, ou link para os textos completos dos artigos". (1) http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess
