Knowledge, perceptions, and practices of stakeholders regarding sports manipulation: results of the IntegriSport 3.0 transnational study

Authors

  • Raquel Mirabet Agulled National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Barcelona (UB), Av. de l’Estadi 12-22, Anella Olímpica, E-08038 Barcelona (Spain) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4149-2297
  • Paula Pla Pla Motor Action Research Group (GIAM), Institut de Desenvolupament Social i Territorial (INDEST), National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Barcelona (UB), Av. de l’Estadi 12-22, Anella Olímpica, E-08038 Barcelona (Spain)
  • Meritxell Monguillot Hernando National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Barcelona (UB), Av. de l’Estadi 12-22, Anella Olímpica, E-08038 Barcelona (Spain) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1114-6529

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v82.119390

Keywords:

Sports integrity, Legal frameworks, Sports manipulation, Risk perception

Abstract

Introduction: The manipulation of sports competitions (match-fixing) constitutes a growing threat to the integrity of sport, with a transnational dimension and a frequent link to organized crime, sports betting, and the use of new technologies such as esports and virtual currencies.

Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze the level of knowledge, risk perception, and professional practices of key institutional stakeholders involved in the prevention and investigation of sports manipulation in six European countries.

Methodology: A mixed-methods research design was adopted, combining a situational survey administered to 280 professionals, 79 qualitative interviews conducted during on-site Fact-Finding Missions, and a comparative documentary analysis of the regulatory frameworks and registered cases in Austria, Bulgaria, Estonia, Greece, Romania, and Spain.

Results: The results showed a low level of risk perception in several countries, limited knowledge of the Macolin Convention—with an unawareness rate exceeding 60% in three of the six analyzed contexts—and limited practical experience, as more than 80% of the respondents had not participated in sports manipulation investigations. Furthermore, significant differences between national legal frameworks and a widespread lack of specialized police units were identified.

Discussion: These findings are consistent with previous studies indicating the low institutional prioritization of match-fixing, and they highlight structural deficiencies in training, inter-institutional cooperation, and investigative capacity.

Conclusions: The results demonstrate the need for a coordinated European strategy that strengthens the regulatory framework, consolidates specialized training, and improves cooperation mechanisms to effectively protect the integrity of sport.

References

Andrews, M. & Harrington, P. (2016). Off Pitch: Football’s Financial Integrity Weaknesses, and How to Strengthen Them. CID Working Paper No. 311. Center for International Development at Har-vard University. https://bsc.cid.harvard.edu/files/bsc/files/cid _wp_311.pdf

Aquilona, S., & Chetcuti, A. (2013). Safeguarding sport integrity against match-fixing: Policy approach-es and challenges. European Commission.

Carpenter, K., (2012). Match-fixing: the biggest threat to sport in the 21st century? International sport in Law review, 2 (1), 13–24.

Chappelet, J-L. (2011). “The Role of Governments in the Fight against Corruption in Sport.” Play the Game (18 March). http://playthegame.org/news/comments /2011/the-role-of-governments-in-the-fight-against -corruption-in-sport.

Chappelet, J. L. (2015). The Olympic fight against match-fixing. Sport in Society, 18, 1260–1272. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2015.1034519

Chappelet, J.-L., & Verschuuren, P. (2019). International sports and match fixing. En J. A. Maguire, M. Falcous, & K. Liston (Eds.), The business and culture of sports: Society, politics, economy, envi-ronment (Vol. 4, pp. 429–441). Macmillan Reference USA.

Comisión Nacional para combatir la manipulación de las competiciones deportivas y el fraude en las apuestas (CONFAD). (s. f.). Convenio de Macolin. Recuperado de https://confad.ordenacionjuego.gob.es/convenio-de-macolin

Comisión Nacional para combatir la manipulación de las competiciones deportivas y el fraude en las apuestas (CONFAD). (s. f.). Conócenos. Recuperado de https://confad.ordenacionjuego.gob.es/conocenos

Council of Europe. (s. f.). Full list – Treaty Office. Recuperat de https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=signatures-by-treaty&treatynum=215

Council of Europe. (s. f.). Convention on the Manipulation of Sports Competitions – Web page (www.coe.int/macolin). Recuperat de https://rm.coe.int/t-mc-en-web-page-macolin-community-goc/1680785422?utm

Council of Europe. 2014. Convention on the Manipulation of Sports Competitions (Macolin Conven-tion). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

España. (2023). Ley 2/2023, de 20 de febrero, reguladora de la protección de las personas que infor-men sobre infracciones normativas y de lucha contra la corrupción (BOE-A-2023-4513). Recu-perat de https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/2023/BOE-A-2023-4513-consolidado.pdf

Eurojust. 2021. Threat Assessment: Combating the Manipulation of Sports Competitions. The Hague: European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation.

Forrest, David. 2013. “Match-Fixing and Sport Betting: Risks and Policy Responses.” International Jour-nal of Sport Finance.

Gray, S. J., & Porreca, R. (2024). Explaining elite athletes’ corruption behaviours: A comparative analysis of doping and match fixing. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 16(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2023.2290118

Holden, John T., Anastasios Kaburakis, and Ryan M. Rodenberg. 2016. “Esports Corruption: Gambling, Match-Fixing, and Global Regulation.” Maryland Journal of International Law 31 (1): 236–273.

Howlett, M., 2018. Matching policy tools and their targets: beyond nudges and utility maximisation in policy design. Policy & politics, 46 (1), 101–124. doi:10.1332/030557317X15053060139376

Interpol. 2023. Integrity in Sport: Emerging Threats and Responses. Lyon: International Criminal Poli-ce Organization.

Interpol, and International Olympic Committee. 2021. Handbook on Protecting Sport from Competition Manipulation. Lausanne: IOC and Interpol.

Kniaziev, S., Morhunov, O., Samokhvalova, I., Tymoshenko, Y., & Smirnov, A. (2024). Manipulation of sports competitions: Investigation and prevention. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 16(3), 1111–1126.

Kiemle-Gabbay, L., Cameron, A., & Lavallee, D. (2023). Developing an evidence-base for a national poli-ce agency to address competition manipulation in sport. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action, 14, 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/21520704.2022. 2121795

Kihl, Lisa A., James Skinner, and Tomas Engelberg. 2018. “Corruption in Sport: Understanding the Com-plexity of Corruption.” European Sport Management Quarterly 18 (1): 1–20.

Lang, Markus, and Christoph Breuer, eds. 2020. Handbook on a Whistleblowing System in Sport. Colog-ne: German Sport University. Published within the framework of the Erasmus+ project “WHISTLE.”

Lavallee, D., Braekeveld, D., Hall, N., Sheppard-Marks, L., & Marinelli, C. (2024). Analysis of patterns and trends in competition manipulation in sport global data: 2018–2023. Managing Sport and Lei-sure. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2024.2420060

Maennig, Wolfgang. 2005. “Corruption in International Sports and How It May Be Combated.” European Sport Management Quarterly.

Masters, A., 2015. Corruption in sport: from the playing field to the field of policy. Policy and society, 34 (2), 111–123. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.04.002

Moriconi, M. (2016). “The Official Football Match Fixing Prevention Discourse as a Cognitive Limitation (the Cases of Iberian Countries).” Soccer & Society 19, no. 2: 271–287.

Moriconi, M. (2024). What are they talking about? Dislocations between institutional narratives and on-field sports actors’ perspectives on match-fixing. Deviant Behavior, 45(3), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2023.2246094

Ricci, Ornella, Valerio Scafarto, and Emanuele Marsigaglia. 2016. “Corruption in Sport: Issues, Challen-ges, and Solutions.” Journal of Financial Crime.

Serby, Tom. 2015. “The Council of Europe Convention on Manipulation of Sports Competitions.” Inter-national Sports Law Journal.

Tak, M., Sam, M. P., & Jackson, S. J. (2018). The politics of countermeasures against match-fixing in sport: A political sociology approach to policy instruments. International Review for the Socio-logy of Sport, 53(1), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690216639748

Van Bottenburg, M. (2021). A relational and processual perspective on good governance in sport: Ta-ckling the deeper problem. In A. Geeraert, & F. van Eekeren (Eds.), Good governance in sport: Critical reflections (pp. 30–41). Routledge.

Van Der Hoeven, D., De Waegeneer, E., Constandt, B., & Willem, A. (2020). Match-fixing: Moral challeng-es for those involved. Ethics & Behavior, 30(6), 425– 443. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2019. 1667238

Vanwersch, L., Vandercruysse, L., Vermeersch, A., Vander Beken, T., Willem, A., Constandt, B., & Har-dyns, W. (2025). The grayness of match-fixing: A study of the prevalence and sanctionability of non-betting-related match-fixing in football and tennis. Deviant Behavior, 46(6), 709–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2024.2364279

Downloads

Published

01-09-2026

Issue

Section

Original Research Article

How to Cite

Mirabet Agulled, R., Pla Pla, P., & Monguillot Hernando, M. (2026). Knowledge, perceptions, and practices of stakeholders regarding sports manipulation: results of the IntegriSport 3.0 transnational study. Retos, 82, 963-978. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v82.119390