Article RETRACTED due to malpractice  AI-Powered Assessment in Physical Education: Rethinking Student Engagement through Social Sciences Perspectives

Autores/as

  • Rimmi sen Search Scholer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v82.117652

Palabras clave:

Physical education, Artificial intelligence, Motion analytics, Personalized feedback, Algorithmic assessment, Wearable data, Student engagement, Self-efficacy, Social interaction, Real time

Resumen

This paper has explored the impact of AI assessment on Physical Education (PE) through the social science perspective to determine the technology’s impact on student engagement, equity, and inclusion. The primary objective was to understand the value of algorithmic tools, wearable technology, and personalized feedback systems in tracking participation rates using assessments that extend beyond traditional performance-based evaluations. Many of these aspects were addressed through a secondary research methodology, which encapsulated a range of peer-reviewed literature and empirical research spanning computer science, psychology, and education. Such an approach facilitated the incorporation of credible evidence, which included engagement detection accuracies of 81–92% and self-efficacy increases of more than 22%, thereby enabling the formulation of a coherent analytical framework. The results indicated that AI motion analytics accomplished more than performance assessments by uncovering hidden patterns of participation, and that adaptive feedback systems enhanced motivation and skill acquisition through machine learning and virtual reality (VR) corrections. Wearable technology captured more simplified measures of engagement, collaboration, and well-being, illustrating the cross-dimensional aspects of participation in PE. Other, more advanced algorithmic assessments further reframed equity, although there were still trust and privacy issues, which amplified the need for explainable AI and automated bias detection and removal. This study demonstrated that AI-powered assessment captures more dimensions of engagement and applies more equity and transparency in evaluation practices, although success in these areas hinges on the delicate balance between technological bias and student trust.

Referencias

Annapureddy, G. R. (2025). Advanced Data Analytics and AI-driven Insights for Robotics Optimization: A Comprehensive Analysis. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 46(3). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Govardhan-Reddy-Annapureddy/publication/390748534_Advanced_Data_Analytics_and_AI-driven_Insights_for_Robotics_Optimization_A_Comprehensive_Analysis/links/67fc5bb6d1054b0207d30015/Advanced-Data-Analytics-and-AI-driven-Insights-for-Robotics-Optimization-A-Comprehensive-Analysis.pdf

Bustos-Lopez, M., Cruz-Ramirez, N., Guerra-Hernandez, A., Sánchez-Morales, L. N., Cruz-Ramos, N. A., & Alor-Hernandez, G. (2022). Wearables for engagement detection in learning environments: A review. Biosensors, 12(7), 509. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6374/12/7/509

Chai, F., Ma, J., Wang, Y., Zhu, J. and Han, T., 2024. Grading by AI makes me feel fairer? How different evaluators affect college students’ perception of fairness. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, p.1221177. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1221177/pdf

Chen, L., Xia, C., Zhao, Z., Fu, H., & Chen, Y. (2024). AI-driven sensing technology. Sensors, 24(10), 2958. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/10/2958

Ding, X., Wei, S., Gui, X., Gu, N., & Zhang, P. (2021, May). Data engagement reconsidered: a study of automatic stress tracking technology in use. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-13). https://arxiv.org/pdf/2101.05450

Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C. I., Rammal, H. G., & Veiga, P. M. (2021). Wearable technology and consumer interaction: A systematic review and research agenda. Computers in human behavior, 118, 106710. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/145458/2/Binder1.pdf

Gm, D., Goudar, R. H., Kulkarni, A. A., Rathod, V. N., & Hukkeri, G. S. (2024). A digital recommendation system for personalized learning to enhance online education: A review. IEEE Access, 12, 34019-34041. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/6287639/6514899/10445145.pdf

Guo, W., Craig, O., Difato, T., Oliverio, J., Santoso, M., Sonke, J., & Barmpoutis, A. (2022, June). AI-Driven human motion classification and analysis using laban movement system. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 201-210). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Angelos-Barmpoutis/publication/361337463_AI-Driven_Human_Motion_Classification_and_Analysis_Using_Laban_Movement_System/links/67069e1fde6db7509d659764/AI-Driven-Human-Motion-Classification-and-Analysis-Using-Laban-Movement-System.pdf

Han, X. (2025). The Influence of AI-Powered Personalized Feedback Systems on Motor Skill Development and Self-Efficacy in PE Learning among University Students in Heilojiang, China. Uniglobal Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(2), 97-107. https://ujssh.com/index.php/ujssh/article/download/231/233

Kuleva, M. (2024, June). Exploring the integration of virtual reality in physical education: A comprehensive review. In Environment. Technologies. Resources. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 197-201). https://journals.rta.lv/index.php/ETR/article/download/8057/6367

Mok, L., Nanda, S., & Anderson, A. (2023). People perceive algorithmic assessments as less fair and trustworthy than identical human assessments. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7(CSCW2), 1-26. https://www.academia.edu/download/110568971/3610100.pdf

Nieminen, J. H. (2025). How does assessment shape student identities? An integrative review. Studies in Higher Education, 50(2), 287-305. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03075079.2024.2334844

Nowell, W. B., Curtis, J. R., Zhao, H., Xie, F., Stradford, L., Curtis, D., ... & Hayes, V. S. (2023). Participant engagement and adherence to providing smartwatch and patient-reported outcome data: digital tracking of rheumatoid arthritis longitudinally (DIGITAL) real-world study. JMIR Human Factors, 10(1), e44034. https://humanfactors.jmir.org/2023/1/e44034/

Saputra, I., Kurniawan, A., Yanita, M., Putri, E. Y., & Mahniza, M. (2024). The evolution of educational assessment: How artificial intelligence is shaping the trends and future of learning evaluation. The Indonesian Journal of Computer Science, 13(6). http://www.ijcs.net/ijcs/index.php/ijcs/article/download/4465/824

Singh, D. K. (2022). Revolutionizing sports: Unleashing the power of next-gen markerless motion analytics. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 6, 13. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dippu-Kumar-Singh/publication/389894302_Revolutionizing_sports_Unleashing_the_power_of_next-gen_markerless_motion_analytics/links/67d7b41d7d56ad0a0f04e878/Revolutionizing-sports-Unleashing-the-power-of-next-gen-markerless-motion-analytics.pdf

Zhu, J., Dallal, D.H., Gray, R.C., Villareale, J., Ontañón, S., Forman, E.M. & Arigo, D., (2021). Personalization paradox in behavior change apps: lessons from a social comparison-based personalized app for physical activity. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1), pp.1-21. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3449190

Descargas

Publicado

26-04-2026

Número

Sección

Retractación de artículos

Cómo citar

sen, R. (2026). Article RETRACTED due to malpractice  AI-Powered Assessment in Physical Education: Rethinking Student Engagement through Social Sciences Perspectives. Retos, 82. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v82.117652