Hexagonal agility test time measurement device: a sensor-based smartphone solution

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v77.118156

Keywords:

Athlete agility, measurement device, sensor-based, sports performance, sports technology

Abstract

Introduction: Traditional agility measurements often rely on stopwatches and human responses, leading to low accuracy and consistency. Sensors have been used in some agility tests, but not in hexagonal agility test (HAT).

Objective: This study develops a digital and Android-based automated timing measurement device for measuring athlete agility. We hypothesize that the HAT device can provide more accurate, instantaneous, and consistent measurement results.

Methodology: Forty-two coaching education students from Jambi University (33 males, 9 females; mean age of 19.3 ± 0.8 years, mean body mass of 59.1 ± 12.5 kg, and mean height of 166.4 ± 7.4 cm) participated in this study. Intra-rater reliability analysis was conducted for manual measurements and utilizing the developed HAT device.

Results: The analysis yielded highly satisfactory inter-rater reliability scores (ICC: 0.9) across all testing sessions. Furthermore, the average results of the test-retest for both testing methods demonstrated minimal variability between raters, indicating the HAT measurement’s high reliability.

Discussion: The automated HAT device demonstrated high agreement with manual measurements but showed significant differences due to human response time and fatigue in manual stopwatch use. The HAT device provided faster and more consistent measurements.

Conclusions: The device accurately measures HAT agility but has limitations with the infrared sensor. Future work could explore alternative sensors and expand the device’s application to other agility tests.

References

Alzahrani, A., Hu, S., Azorin-Peris, V., Barrett, L., Esliger, D., Hayes, M., Akbare, S., Achart, J., & Kuoch, S. (2015). A multi-channel opto-electronic sensor to accurately monitor heart rate against motion artefact during exercise. Sensors (Switzerland), 15(10), 25681–25702. https://doi.org/10.3390/s151025681

Amaral Féris, M. A., Goffin, K., Zwikael, O., & Fan, D. (2021). Enhancing software development through project-based learning and the quality of planning. R and D Management, 51(5), 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12435

Anstiss, P. A., Meijen, C., Madigan, D. J., & Marcora, S. M. (2018). Development and initial validation of the Endurance Sport Self-Efficacy Scale (ESSES). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 38(November 2017), 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.06.015

Arief, N. A., Nugraha, T. A., Gede Agung Sri Sidhimantra, I., Anwar, S., Umaroh, S. T., & Asmara, Y. P. (2023). Application of alacrity as a means to improve athlete s agility. In S. N., P. B.K., S. M., & T. H.P.A. (Eds.), E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 450). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20234500200

Beekhuizen, K. S., Davis, M. D., Kolber, M. J., & Cheng, M.-S. S. (2009). Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the hexagon agility test. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 23(7), 2167–2171. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b439f0

Bian, C., Ye, B., & Mihailidis, A. (2022). The Development and Concurrent Validity of a Multi-Sensor-Based Frailty Toolkit for In-Home Frailty Assessment. Sensors, 22(9), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093532

Bravi, M., Santacaterina, F., Bressi, F., Morrone, M., Renzi, A., Di Tocco, J., Schena, E., Sterzi, S., & Massaroni, C. (2023). Instrumented treadmill for run biomechanics analysis: A comparative study. Biomedizinische Technik, 68(6), 563–571. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2022-0258

Bruzzo, J., Perkins, N. C., & Mikkola, A. (2020). Embedded inertial measurement unit reveals pole lean angle for cross-country skiing. Sports Engineering, 23(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-019-0316-3

Dewanti, R. A., & Hermawan, I. (2022). A comparative study on measuring running speed using timing gates and stopwatches to reduce human error. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 22(12), 3080–3085. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2022.12390

Dimarucot, H. C., & Macapagal, L. S. (2021). The validity and reliability of three field tests for assessing college freshmen students’ cardiovascular endurance. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 9(2), 363–374. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13189/SAJ.2021.090226

Gupta, P., Mittal, L., Rizzo, R. A., Bikkina, M., & Debari, V. A. (2009). In-use comparison of blood pressure measurements from an automated blood pressure instrument with those from a mercury sphygmomanometer. Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology, 43(2), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.2345/0899-8205-43.2.158

Hernández-Davo, J. L., Loturco, I., Pereira, L. A., Cesari, R., Pratdesaba, J., Madruga-Parera, M., Sanz-Rivas, D., & Fernández-Fernández, J. (2021). Relationship between sprint, change of direction, jump, and hexagon test performance in young tennis players. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 20(2), 197–203. https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2021.197

Hui, S. C. N., Zhang, T., Shi, L., Wang, D., Ip, C.-B., & Chu, W. C. W. (2018). Automated segmentation of abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue and visceral adipose tissue in obese adolescent in MRI. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 45, 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2017.09.016

Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCM.2016.02.012

Lima, T. B., Gomes, W. dos S., Santos, T. M., & Campos, E. Z. (2025). Validity and reliability of two submaximal tests for estimating maximal oxygen consumption in adults. Retos, 69, 1330–1338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v69.108833

Maeda, Y., Okawara, H., Sawada, T., Nakashima, D., Nagahara, J., Fujitsuka, H., Ikeda, K., Hoshino, S., Kobari, Y., Katsumata, Y., Nakamura, M., & Nagura, T. (2023). Implications of the Onset of Sweating on the Sweat Lactate Threshold. Sensors, 23(7), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23073378

Matkarimov, R., Tajibaev, S., Astuti, Y., Toshpulatov, K., Ismoilov, G., Mamajonov, D., Khojiev, S., & Khasanov, A. (2024). Enhancement of a software–hardware system for measuring volleyball players’ speed indicators and evaluating its effectiveness in a pedagogical context. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 24(9), 1194–1208. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2024.09244

Miranda, D. L., Hsu, W.-H., Gravelle, D. C., Petersen, K., Ryzman, R., Niemi, J., & Lesniewski-Laas, N. (2016). Sensory enhancing insoles improve athletic performance during a hexagonal agility task. Journal of Biomechanics, 49(7), 1058–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.02.022

Nursuwars, F. M. S., Gufroni, A. I., Hiron, N., & Shofa, R. N. (2020). Mobile Application as Media Monitoring in the Agility Record System (ARS). ICSECC 2020 - 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Engineering and Creative Computing, Proceedings, 423–427. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSECC51444.2020.9557496

Nursuwars, F. M. S., Hiron, N., Usrah, I., Sambas, A., Abdullah, M. R., Zakaria, M. D., & Jamal, A. A. (2025). A Paradigm Shift in Sports Science: The IOT-Enhanced Agility-Pad for Athletic Performance Evaluation. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 50(2), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.50.2.246259

Parente, J. D., Dhamodharan, A., Hensler, S., Kuhlbach, C., Mueller, M. M., & Möller, K. (2019). Automatic Image Analysis System to Measure Wound Area in Vitro. Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering, 5(1), 421–424. https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2019-0106

Peebles, A. T., Maguire, L. A., Renner, K. E., & Queen, R. M. (2018). Validity and Repeatability of Single-Sensor Loadsol Insoles during Landing. Sensors, 18(12), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/S18124082

Perrotta, A. S., Day, B. D., Wafai, I., Oates, R. P., Peterson, M. L., Scott, A. J., Barker, R. C., Garedakis, A. B., & Seaborn, K. A. (2023). Concurrent validity and reliability of photoelectric and accelerometer technology for calculating vertical jump height in female athletes. Sports Engineering, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-023-00440-6

Qowiyyuridho, G., Tomoliyus, & Fauzi. (2021). Validity and reliability of agility test with dribbling and passing in soccer games. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 9(2), 301–307. https://doi.org/10.13189/SAJ.2021.090218

Quílez-Maimón, A., Rojas-Ruiz, F. J., Delgado-García, G., & Courel-Ibáñez, J. (2021). The q-pass index: A multifactorial imus-based tool to assess passing skills in basketball. Sensors, 21(13), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21134601

Rusdiana, A., Mulyana, B., Nurjaya, D. R., Badaruzman, Imanudin, I., Fauziah, E., & Syahid, A. M. (2021). 3D Biomechanical Analysis of Swimming Start Movements Using a Portable Smart Platform With Android Pie. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 16(1), 571–585.

Sarpong, D., Boakye, D., Ofosu, G., & Botchie, D. (2022). The three pointers of research and development (R&D) for growth-boosting sustainable innovation system. Technovation, 122, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102581

Stitt, D., Draper, N., Alexander, K., & Kabaliuk, N. (2021). Laboratory validation of instrumented mouthguard for use in sport. Sensors, 21(18), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186028

Downloads

Published

01-04-2026

Issue

Section

Original Research Article

How to Cite

Indrayana, B., Simbolon, M. E. M., Widowati, A., Sukendro, S., Firdausi, D. K. A., & Dwisaputra, I. (2026). Hexagonal agility test time measurement device: a sensor-based smartphone solution. Retos, 77, 94-101. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v77.118156