Collaborative sport governance in IOC and the UN Women: A case study from the perspective of actor network theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v68.115235Keywords:
Actor-network theory, collaborative sport governance, IOC, UN WomenAbstract
Introduction: Increasing complexities and changes in global sport governance required the collaboration of international organizations and governments, with traditional governance issues such as gender conflicts still persisted, while new conflicts continued to emerge, international organizations were not able to tackle governance challenges solely.
Objective: The study focused on the collaborative governance between the International Olympic Committee and United Nations Women.
Methodology: This study constructs diachronic corpus in the framework of actor-network theory, with which high frequency governance participants and keywords were analyzed via AntConc 4.2.4, while BibExcel and Ucinet 6.0 were employed to illustrate their heterogeneous networks, main problems faced in each period as well as participation in a chronological manner. Utilizing the Blau index and Ucinet 6.0, the study calculated networks’ heterogeneity index and density, exploring the development and mechanism of collaborative sport governance.
Results: The collaborative sport governance revolved around female leadership, anti-violence and welfare; campaigns and programs need to integrate organizational governance, Olympic legacy inheritance, governmental gender equality, commercialization of sponsorship, etc; governance participants were the most diverse from 2017 to 2019 and exhibited the highest connectivity from 2020 to 2024, indicating that the diversity of participants in collaborative sport governance fluctuated with problems, but multilateral connections have witnessed a continuous steady increase.
Conclusions: Governance participants need to balance interests and risks, adopt changes and seek common grounds while respecting differences, therefore forming a diverse, inter-connected, stable and sustainable mechanism for collaborative sport governance, and ultimately achieving gender equality.
References
Burgess, J., Clark, J., & Harrison, C. M. (2000). Knowledges in action: an actor network analysis of a wet-land agri-environment scheme. Ecological Economics, 35(1), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00172-5
Callon, M. (1984). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(1_suppl), 196-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1984.tb00113.x
Callon, M. (1986). The sociology of an actor-network: The case of the electric vehicle. In Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp. 19-34). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07408-2
Castan-Vicente, F., Nicolas, C., & Cervin, G. (2019). Women in sport organizations: Historiographical and epistemological challenges. In G. Cervin & C. Nicolas (Eds.), Histories of women's work in global sport (pp. 17–48). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26909-8_2
Chappelet, J. (2021). The governance of the Olympic system: from one to many stakeholders. Journal of Global Sport Management, 8(4), 783-800. https://doi.org/10.1080/24704067.2021.1899767
Chappelet, J. (2013). The global governance of sport: An overview. In I. Henry & L.-M. Ko (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sport policy (1st ed., pp. 63-74). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203807217
Chatzigianni, E. (2017). Global sport governance: globalizing the globalized. Sport in Society, 21(9), 1454-1482. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2017.1390566
Collins, R., & Blau, P. M. (1979). Inequality and heterogeneity: a primitive theory of social structure. Social Forces, 58(2), 677. https://doi.org/10.2307/2577612
De Moura, G. X., Fernandes, A. V., Starepravo, F. A., & De Assis Pimentel, G. G. (2020). The invisibility of women in legislations and National Conferences of sport and leisure in Brazil. Journal of Gender Studies, 29(7), 779–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2020.1770060
Ferkins, L., & Shilbury, D. (2019). Theoretical underpinnings of sport governance. In D. Shilbury & L. Ferkins (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Sport Governance (pp. 18-32). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429440250
Ferkins, L., Shilbury, D., & O’Boyle, I. (2017). Leadership in governance: Exploring collective board leadership in sport governance systems. Sport Management Review, 21(3), 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2017.07.007
Galily, Y., & Betzer-Tayar, M. (2014). Losing is Not an Option! Women’s Basketball in Israel and its Struggle for Equality (1985-2002). The International Journal of the History of Sport, 31(13), 1694-1705. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2014.933508
Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199-1228. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586096
Hayhurst, L. M., MacNeill, M., Kidd, B., & Knoppers, A. (2014). Gender relations, gender-based violence and sport for development and peace: Questions, concerns and cautions emerging from Uganda. Women’s Studies International Forum, 47, 157-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.07.011
Lachmann, M., Trapp, I., & Trapp, R. (2016). Diversity and validity in positivist management accounting research—A longitudinal perspective over four decades. Management Accounting Research, 34, 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.07.002
Latour, B. (1993). The pasteurization of France. Harvard University Press.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: the construction of scientific facts. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt32bbxc
Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Sys-tems Practice, 5(4), 379-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01059830
Meier, H. E., & García, B. (2021). Beyond sports autonomy: a case for collaborative sport governance approaches. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 13(3), 501-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2021.1905035
Mujica, R. A., & Meza, M. C. (2009). Women’s rights in Peru: insights from two organizations. Global Networks, 9(4), 485-506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00265.x
O’Boyle, I., & Shilbury, D. (2015). Exploring issues of trust in collaborative sport governance. Journal of Sport Management, 30(1), 52-69. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2015-0175
Oxford, S. (2019). ‘You look like a machito!’: a decolonial analysis of the social in/exclusion of fe-male participants in a Colombian sport for development and peace organization. Sport in Socie-ty, 22(6), 1025-1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2019.1565389
Oxford, S., & Spaaij, R. (2019). Gender Relations and Sport for Development in Colombia: A Decolonial Feminist analysis. Leisure Sciences, 41(1-2), 54-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2018.1539679
Postlethwaite, V., & Grix, J. (2016). Beyond the acronyms: sport diplomacy and the classification of the International Olympic Committee. Diplomacy and Statecraft, 27(2), 295-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2016.1169796
Rhodes, R. (2007). Understanding Governance: Ten years on. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1243-1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076586
Rosenau, J. N., & Czempiel, E. (1992). Governance without government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521775
Sawyer, T. H., Bodey, K. J., & Judge, L. W. (2008). Sport governance and policy development: an ethical approach to managing sport in the 21st Century. Champaign, IL: Sagamore Publish-ing.https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=zh-CN&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Sport+governance+and+policy+development%3A+An+ethical+approach+to+managing+sport+in+the+21st+century&btnG=
Sokolova, M. V., DiCaprio, A., Collinson, N. B., & Quirante, Z. (2023). Beating the odds: Women’s lead-ership in international organizations. Politics & Gender, 19(4), 1087-1109. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x23000107
Tackling violence against women and girls in sport: A handbook for policy makers and sports practi-tioners. (2020, July 31). UN Women-Headquarters. https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2023/07/tackling-violence-against-women-and-girls-in-sport-a-handbook-for-policy-makers-and-sports-practitioners
Van Luijk, N. (2013). A Historical Examination of the IOC and UN Partnership: 1952-1980.[Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia]. https://open.library.ubc.ca/media/download/pdf/24/1.0216479/4
Van Luijk, N. (2018). The International Olympic Committee: A United Nations Permanent Observer of post-politics? International Area Studies Review, 21(2), 134-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865918761110
Weiss, T. & Gordenker, L. (1996). NGOs, the UN, and Global Governance. Boulder, USA: Lynne Rienner Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685855987
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Peiwei Zhao, Haiyan Yu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.
