A governação desportiva colaborativa no COI e na ONU Mulheres: Um estudo de caso na perspetiva da teoria da rede de atores

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v68.115235

Palavras-chave:

Teoria ator-rede, governação desportiva colaborativa, COI, ONU Mulheres

Resumo

Introdução: As crescentes complexidades e mudanças na governação desportiva global exigiram a colaboração de organizações e governos internacionais, com questões tradicionais de governação, como os conflitos de género, ainda a persistir, enquanto novos conflitos continuaram a surgir, as organizações internacionais não foram capazes de enfrentar os desafios de governação sozinhas.
Objectivo: O estudo centrou-se na governação colaborativa entre o Comité Olímpico Internacional e as Mulheres das Nações Unidas.
Metodologia: Este estudo constrói um corpus diacrónico no âmbito da teoria ator-rede, com o qual os participantes de governação de alta frequência e palavras-chave foram analisados ​​via AntConc 4.2.4, enquanto BibExcel e Ucinet 6.0 foram empregues para ilustrar as suas redes heterogéneas, os principais problemas enfrentados em cada período, bem como a participação de forma cronológica. Utilizando o índice Blau e o Ucinet 6.0, o estudo calculou o índice de heterogeneidade e a densidade das redes, explorando o desenvolvimento e o mecanismo de governação desportiva colaborativa.
Resultados: A governação desportiva colaborativa girou em torno da liderança feminina, da anti-violência e do bem-estar; campanhas e programas precisam de integrar a governação organizacional, a herança do legado olímpico, a igualdade de género governamental, a comercialização de patrocínio, etc. Os participantes na governação foram os mais diversificados de 2017 a 2019 e exibiram a maior conectividade de 2020 a 2024, indicando que a diversidade de participantes na governação desportiva colaborativa flutuou com problemas, mas as ligações multilaterais testemunharam um aumento constante e contínuo.
Conclusões: Os participantes na governação necessitam de equilibrar interesses e riscos, adoptar mudanças e procurar pontos em comum, respeitando as diferenças, formando assim um mecanismo diverso, interligado, estável e sustentável para a governação desportiva colaborativa e, finalmente, alcançar a igualdade de género.

Biografias Autor

Peiwei Zhao, Renmin University of China


中国人民大学体育部,100872

Haiyan Yu, The school of International Education and Exchange, 100084, Beijing Sport University

北京体育大学国际教育交流学院,100084

Referências

Burgess, J., Clark, J., & Harrison, C. M. (2000). Knowledges in action: an actor network analysis of a wet-land agri-environment scheme. Ecological Economics, 35(1), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00172-5

Callon, M. (1984). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(1_suppl), 196-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1984.tb00113.x

Callon, M. (1986). The sociology of an actor-network: The case of the electric vehicle. In Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp. 19-34). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07408-2

Castan-Vicente, F., Nicolas, C., & Cervin, G. (2019). Women in sport organizations: Historiographical and epistemological challenges. In G. Cervin & C. Nicolas (Eds.), Histories of women's work in global sport (pp. 17–48). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26909-8_2

Chappelet, J. (2021). The governance of the Olympic system: from one to many stakeholders. Journal of Global Sport Management, 8(4), 783-800. https://doi.org/10.1080/24704067.2021.1899767

Chappelet, J. (2013). The global governance of sport: An overview. In I. Henry & L.-M. Ko (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sport policy (1st ed., pp. 63-74). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203807217

Chatzigianni, E. (2017). Global sport governance: globalizing the globalized. Sport in Society, 21(9), 1454-1482. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2017.1390566

Collins, R., & Blau, P. M. (1979). Inequality and heterogeneity: a primitive theory of social structure. Social Forces, 58(2), 677. https://doi.org/10.2307/2577612

De Moura, G. X., Fernandes, A. V., Starepravo, F. A., & De Assis Pimentel, G. G. (2020). The invisibility of women in legislations and National Conferences of sport and leisure in Brazil. Journal of Gender Studies, 29(7), 779–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2020.1770060

Ferkins, L., & Shilbury, D. (2019). Theoretical underpinnings of sport governance. In D. Shilbury & L. Ferkins (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Sport Governance (pp. 18-32). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429440250

Ferkins, L., Shilbury, D., & O’Boyle, I. (2017). Leadership in governance: Exploring collective board leadership in sport governance systems. Sport Management Review, 21(3), 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2017.07.007

Galily, Y., & Betzer-Tayar, M. (2014). Losing is Not an Option! Women’s Basketball in Israel and its Struggle for Equality (1985-2002). The International Journal of the History of Sport, 31(13), 1694-1705. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2014.933508

Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199-1228. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586096

Hayhurst, L. M., MacNeill, M., Kidd, B., & Knoppers, A. (2014). Gender relations, gender-based violence and sport for development and peace: Questions, concerns and cautions emerging from Uganda. Women’s Studies International Forum, 47, 157-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.07.011

Lachmann, M., Trapp, I., & Trapp, R. (2016). Diversity and validity in positivist management accounting research—A longitudinal perspective over four decades. Management Accounting Research, 34, 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.07.002

Latour, B. (1993). The pasteurization of France. Harvard University Press.

Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: the construction of scientific facts. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt32bbxc

Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Sys-tems Practice, 5(4), 379-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01059830

Meier, H. E., & García, B. (2021). Beyond sports autonomy: a case for collaborative sport governance approaches. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 13(3), 501-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2021.1905035

Mujica, R. A., & Meza, M. C. (2009). Women’s rights in Peru: insights from two organizations. Global Networks, 9(4), 485-506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00265.x

O’Boyle, I., & Shilbury, D. (2015). Exploring issues of trust in collaborative sport governance. Journal of Sport Management, 30(1), 52-69. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2015-0175

Oxford, S. (2019). ‘You look like a machito!’: a decolonial analysis of the social in/exclusion of fe-male participants in a Colombian sport for development and peace organization. Sport in Socie-ty, 22(6), 1025-1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2019.1565389

Oxford, S., & Spaaij, R. (2019). Gender Relations and Sport for Development in Colombia: A Decolonial Feminist analysis. Leisure Sciences, 41(1-2), 54-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2018.1539679

Postlethwaite, V., & Grix, J. (2016). Beyond the acronyms: sport diplomacy and the classification of the International Olympic Committee. Diplomacy and Statecraft, 27(2), 295-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2016.1169796

Rhodes, R. (2007). Understanding Governance: Ten years on. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1243-1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076586

Rosenau, J. N., & Czempiel, E. (1992). Governance without government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521775

Sawyer, T. H., Bodey, K. J., & Judge, L. W. (2008). Sport governance and policy development: an ethical approach to managing sport in the 21st Century. Champaign, IL: Sagamore Publish-ing.https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=zh-CN&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Sport+governance+and+policy+development%3A+An+ethical+approach+to+managing+sport+in+the+21st+century&btnG=

Sokolova, M. V., DiCaprio, A., Collinson, N. B., & Quirante, Z. (2023). Beating the odds: Women’s lead-ership in international organizations. Politics & Gender, 19(4), 1087-1109. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x23000107

Tackling violence against women and girls in sport: A handbook for policy makers and sports practi-tioners. (2020, July 31). UN Women-Headquarters. https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2023/07/tackling-violence-against-women-and-girls-in-sport-a-handbook-for-policy-makers-and-sports-practitioners

Van Luijk, N. (2013). A Historical Examination of the IOC and UN Partnership: 1952-1980.[Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia]. https://open.library.ubc.ca/media/download/pdf/24/1.0216479/4

Van Luijk, N. (2018). The International Olympic Committee: A United Nations Permanent Observer of post-politics? International Area Studies Review, 21(2), 134-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865918761110

Weiss, T. & Gordenker, L. (1996). NGOs, the UN, and Global Governance. Boulder, USA: Lynne Rienner Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685855987

Downloads

Publicado

2025-05-18

Como Citar

Zhao, P., & Yu, H. (2025). A governação desportiva colaborativa no COI e na ONU Mulheres: Um estudo de caso na perspetiva da teoria da rede de atores. Retos, 68, 445–465. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v68.115235

Edição

Secção

Artigos de caráter científico: trabalhos de pesquisas básicas e/ou aplicadas.