Evaluation of patient satisfaction with telerehabilitation services for stroke recovery in Saudi Arabia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v74.117971Keywords:
Stroke recovery, telerehabilitation, patient satisfaction, Saudi Arabia, telehealth, rehabilitation outcomes, functional recovery, remote therapyAbstract
Introduction: Stroke is a major global cause of disability and mortality, with increasing incidence rates in Saudi Arabia. Traditional, intensive in-person rehabilitation is challenging, particularly for patients in remote areas. Telerehabilitation offers an effective remote alternative, but patient satisfaction is crucial for its success.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction with telerehabilitation for stroke recovery in Saudi Arabia, focusing on perceived effectiveness and factors influencing satisfaction.
Methodology: A cross-sectional design was used to recruit 377 stroke patients who had completed at least 10 telerehabilitation sessions. Data were collected using validated tools, including the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ).
Results: The majority of patients reported high satisfaction (84.1%) with the services. The average TUQ score across all domains was 4.2/5. Significant positive correlations were found between satisfaction levels and improvements in functional recovery, including mobility, motor skills, and emotional well-being. Key drivers of satisfaction were communication quality, technology reliability, and session accessibility. Satisfaction was higher among younger patients and urban residents. The main barriers reported were technical issues (20.0%) and lack of technology familiarity (18.0%).
Conclusions: High patient satisfaction correlated with better recovery outcomes, emphasizing the need for tailored services. Recommendations include improving technology infrastructure and providing patient training. Telerehabilitation is a well-received and effective alternative to traditional methods in Saudi Arabia.
References
Al-Jadid, M. S. (2013). Disability in Saudi Arabia: An Overview. Saudi Medical Journal, 34(5), 453-60.
Al-Qahtani, M., Alharbi, M., Alqahtani, R., Al-Shehri, R., & Althobaiti, A. (2022). Perspectives on telerehabilitation in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional survey. Saudi J Health Sci, 11(3), 140–6.
Alqahtani, M. M., Alghamdi, O., Alrashdi, I., Alruwaili, Y., & Almutairi, K. (2022). Barriers to accessing healthcare services in rural Saudi Arabia: A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res, 22(1), 88.
Alshammari, S. A., Alsubaie, F. M., Alenzi, N. S., & Alshammari, N. S. (2023). Barriers and facilitators to implementing telerehabilitation for stroke in Saudi Arabia: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 67.
Bashshur, R. L., Doarn, C. R., Della Penna, R. D., & Bashshur, N. (2020). The empirical foundations of telemedicine interventions in stroke care. Telemed e-Health, 26(7), 859–80.
Behlau, M., Kairy, D., & Al-Shargi, R. (2023). Improving patient engagement through telehealth: A stroke rehabilitation perspective. Int J Stroke, 18(1), 78-85.
Chen, J., Chen, C., & Zhang, J. (2021). Patient satisfaction with telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine and e-Health, 27(9), 1071–79.
Cramer, S. C., Arora, A., & Arora, S. (2019). Efficacy of home-based telerehabilitation after stroke. Stroke, 50(12), 3478-85.
Feigin, V. L., Nichols, E., Abd-Allah, M., et al. (2019). Global and regional burden of stroke in 2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Neurology, 18(5), 439–58.
GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators. (2021). Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2019. Lancet Neurol, 20(10), 795–820.
Hillier, S. L., Taylor, H. E., & George, T. P. (2023). Telerehabilitation for stroke recovery: Patient satisfaction and outcomes. Stroke, 54(1), 101–9.
Johansson, T., & Wild, C. (2021). Telerehabilitation in stroke care: A review on technology and outcomes. J Telemed Telecare, 27(3), 131–9.
Kairy, D., Lizee, A., & Lehoux, P. (2021). Telerehabilitation: A scoping review of benefits and challenges. J Telemed Telecare, 27(5), 294–303.
Laver, K. E., George, S., Thomas, S., & Crotty, M. (2020). Telerehabilitation services for stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke, 51(9), 2470–6.
Laver, K. E., Kairy, D., & Hillier, S. (2019). Rehabilitation therapy after stroke: Efficacy of different strategies. Stroke, 50(7), 1986–93.
Powers, W. J., Zaidat, O. O., & Smith, E. E. (2020). Telerehabilitation for post-stroke care: Evidence, implementation, and future directions. J Neurol, 267(11), 3211–8.
Thrift, A. G., Cadilhac, D. A., & Kim, J. (2017). Global stroke statistics. Int J Stroke, 12(1), 13–32.
Vasilopoulou, C., Tali, E., & Griva, M. (2022). Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in chronic conditions: A meta-analysis. Int J Med Inform, 163(4), 104779.
World Bank Group. (2022). Digital infrastructure and its role in telehealth development.
World Health Organization. (2021). The global burden of stroke: Stroke epidemiology and prevention.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Meshal AlAnazi, Paramasivan Mani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.
