The effect of digital leisure participation purposes on psychological well-being among Generation Y: the mediating role of flow experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v80.118841Keywords:
Digital leisure, flow experience, psychological well being, Y generationAbstract
Background: This study examines the mediating role of flow experience in the relationship between participation purposes in digital leisure activities and psychological well-being. Study also investigates the direct effects of participation purposes on flow experience and the effect of flow experience on psychological well-being.
Method: The sample consisted of 291 Generation Y individuals (aged 29–44) selected through purposive sampling, all of whom actively engage with digital platforms during their leisure time. Data were collected using three standardized instruments: the Digital Leisure Participation Purposes Scale (DLPPS), comprising four subdimensions (game, entertainment, socialization, and communication); the Digital Leisure Flow Experience Scale (DLFES), with three subdimensions (experience, activity, and time); and the Psychological Well-Being Scale (PWBS), which has a unidimensional positive structure.
Results: Data analysis was conducted in two stages. First, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to validate the measurement models. Second, structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to examine direct and mediating effects. The results indicate that participation purposes in digital leisure activities have significant positive effects on both flow experience (β = 0.914, p < 0.001) and psychological well-being (β = 0.364, p < 0.001). Additionally, flow experience significantly and positively affects psychological well-being (β = 0.405, p < 0.001), confirming its mediating role.
Conclusions: The findings suggest that Generation Y individuals strongly integrate digital technologies into their daily lives, and that participation in digital leisure activities enhances psychological well-being through the mediating effect of flow experience. Future research should account for the duration and frequency of digital leisure engagement to mitigate potential risks such as addiction and negative health outcomes.
References
Arora, P. (2011). Online social sites as virtual parks: An investigation into leisure online and offline. The Information Society, 27(2), 113-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2011.548702
Asan, K., & Zwiegelaar, J. (2025). Digital leisure use and psychological well-being among recreation management students: The mediating role of social media engagement. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 37, 100570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2025.100570
Ayhan, C., & Eskiler, E. (2024). The relationship between leisure attitude and happiness: the mediating effect of recreational flow experience. International Journal of Recreation and Sports Science, 8(1), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.46463/ijrss.1504810
Aziz, H., Morrissey, H., & Ball, P. (2018). The effect of digital social entertainment on students' emotional well-being in higher education. International Journal of Current Research, 10 (4), 67562-67567.
Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modeling: Adjudging model fit. Personality & Individual Differences, 42(5), 815–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018
Bassi, M., Carissoli, C., Beretta, S., Negri, L., Fianco, A., & Delle Fave, A. (2022). Flow experience and emotional well-being among Italian adolescents during the covıd-19 pandemic. The Journal of Psychology, 156(6), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2022.2074347
Bencsik, A., Horváth-Csikós, G., & Juhász, T. (2016). Y and Z generations at workplaces. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(3), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2016.03.06
Blanco, A. V. (2015). The transformation of leisure in the digital age. in Social media and social movements: the transformation of communication patterns (pp. 165–179). Lanham: Lexington Books.
Boudreau, K. & Consalvo, M. (2014) Families and social network games. Information, Communication & Society, 17(9): 1118-1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.882964
Boyle, E. A., Connolly, T. M., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). Engagement in digital entertainment games: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 771-780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.020
Bryce, J. (2001). The technological transformation of leisure. Social Science Computer Review, 19(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900102
Carnicelli, S., McGillivray, D., & McPherson, G. (2016). Digital leisure cultures: Critical perspectives. Taylor & Francis.
Chang, H. H. (2017). Flow experience in the leisure activities of retirees. Loisir et Société/Society and Leisure, 40(3), 401-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2017.1379163
Chang, L. C., Dattilo, J., & Huang, F. H. (2023). Digital leisure among older adults: Connections to social support, flow, and social inclusion. Leisure Sciences, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2023.2298753
Chen, H. T., & Li, X. (2017). The contribution of mobile social media to social capital and psychological well-being: Examining the role of communicative use, friending and self-disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 958-965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.011
Cheng, T. M., & Lu, C. C. (2015). The causal relationships among recreational involvement, flow experience, and well-being for surfing activities. Asia Pacific Journal Of Tourism Research, 20, 1486–1504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2014.999099
Cheng, T. M., Hung, S. H., & Chen, M. T. (2016). The influence of leisure involvement on flow experience during hiking activity: Using psychological commitment as a mediate variable. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 21(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2014.1002507
Chou, M. J., Tsai, S. S., Hou, T. Y., & Wu, H. T. (2016). The relationship between the undergraduates'flow and psychological well-being--take love affair experiences as the moderator variable. European Journal Of Research İn Social Sciences Vol, 4(4).
Clarke, S. G. & Haworth, J. T. (1994). Flow experience in the daily lives of sixth-form collect students. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 511-523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1994.tb02538.x
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (Eds.). (1992). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Flow and the foundations of positive psychology. Dordrecht:Springer.
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Biswas-Diener, R., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., & Oishi, S. (2009). New measures of well-being. In Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 247-266). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4 12
Elkington, S. (2011) What it is to take the flow of leisure seriously. Leisure/ Loisir, 35(3): 253-282). https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2011.614838
Er, B., & Cengiz, R. (2022). Purposes of participation in digital leisure activities: A scale development study. International Journal of Bozok Sports Sciences, 3(3), 11–28.
Er, B., & Cengiz, R. (2023). The effect of digital leisure participation purposes on flow experience and leisure satisfaction. Journal of ROL Sport Sciences, 544–565. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10031059
Er, B., & Cengiz, R. (2023). Digital leisure flow experience: a scale development study. Spormetre Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, 21(2), 48-62. https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.1207592
Er, B., & Cengiz, R. (2025). The form of happiness in the digital age: examining the effect of ınternet usage in digital leisure on flow experience. International Journal of Recreation and Sports Science, 9(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.46463/ijrss.1608338
Gellmers, J., & Yan, N. (2023). Digital leisure engagement and positive outcomes in the workplace: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021014
George, D. & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 17.0 update. (10th Ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Ghani, J. A. & Deshpande, S. P. (1994). Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction. The Journal of Psychology, 128(4), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1994.9712742
Goh, C., Jones, C., & Copello, A. (2019). A further test of the impact of online gaming on psychological wellbeing and the role of play motivations and problematic use. Psychiatric Quarterly, 90(4), 747-760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-019-09656-x
Gonçalves, D., Pais, P., Gerling, K., Guerreiro, T., & Rodrigues, A. (2023). Social gaming: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 147, 107851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107851
Guo, X. R., Gong, S. Y., Liu, S. Y., Wang, J., Wang, Y. Q., & Zhao, X. (2025). Digital leisure motivational interference decreases college students’ online learning satisfaction: the roles of academic emotions and parental autonomy support. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 40(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00926-2
Hair Jr, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Hu, L. T. ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1): 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hoffman, D. L. ve Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of marketing, 60(3): 50-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299606000304
Howell, R. T., Kern, M. L. & Lyubomirsky, S. (2007). Health benefits: meta-analytically determining the impact of well-being on objective health outcomes. Health Psychology Review, 1, 83-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437190701492486
Juniu, S. (2009). The transformation of leisure. Leisure/Loisir, 33(2), 463-478. https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2009.9651449
Kaur, P., Dhir, A., Chen, S., & Rajala, R. (2016). Flow in context: Development and validation of the flow experience instrument for social networking. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 358-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.039
Kaye, L. K. (2016). Exploring flow experiences in cooperative digital gaming contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 286-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.023
Kline RB. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Khang, A., Hahanov, V., Hajimahmud, V. A., Litvinova, E., Ali, R. N., & Alyar, A. V. (2024). The Impact of the Cyber–Physical Environment and Digital Environment on the Socialization Environment. In Revolutionizing the AI-Digital Landscape (pp. 295-307). Productivity Press.
Leung, L. (2020). Exploring the relationship between smartphone activities, flow experience, and boredom in free time. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 130-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.030
Lin, P. (2023). The relationship between trait mindfulness and well-being in college students: the serial mediation role of flow experience and sports participation. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 2071-2083. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S414890
Lisheng, W., Yan, L. E. I., & Xinjie, P. A. N. (2020). Effects of leisure involvement on the well-being of elderly people: Mediation effects of self-efficacy and flow experience. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 44(9), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.16099/j.sus.2020.09.009
Liu, R., Nagao, H., & Kennedy, J. J. (2025). The digital side to mental health: Uncovering the relationship between screen-based entertainment and mental well-being among older rural residents in China. Social Indicators Research, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-025-03575-0
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L. A. & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803-855. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803
Mao, Y., Luo, X., Wang, S., Mao, Z., Xie, M., & Bonaiuto, M. (2024). Flow experience fosters university students' well‐being through psychological resilience: A longitudinal design with cross‐lagged analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 518-538. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12661
Meier, J. V., Noel, J. A., ve Kaspar, K. (2021). Alone together: computer-mediated communication in leisure time during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 666655. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12661
Nimrod, G., & Adoni, H. (2012) Conceptualizing e-leisure. Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure, 35(1), 31-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2012.10707834
Nimrod, G., & Ivan, L. (2022). The dual roles technology plays in leisure: Insights from a study of grandmothers. Leisure Sciences, 44(6), 715–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2019.1656123
Ostic, D., Qalati, S. A., Barbosa, B., Shah, S. M. M., Galvan Vela, E., Herzallah, A. M., & Liu, F. (2021). Effects of social media use on psychological well-being: a mediated model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 678766. | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678766
Pelet, J. É., Ettis, S., & Cowart, K. (2017). Optimal experience of flow enhanced by telepresence: Evidence from social media use. Information & Management, 54(1), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.05.001
Pizzo, A. D. (2023). Hypercasual and hybrid-casual video gaming: A digital leisure perspective. Leisure Sciences, 47(6), 1333–1352. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2023.2211056
Pressman, S. D. & Cohen, S. (2005). Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 925–971. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.925
Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2023). Instagram and TikTok flow states and their association with psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 26(2), 80-89. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0117
Rojas de Francisco, L., López-Sintas, J., & García-Álvarez, E. (2016). Social leisure in the digital age. Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure, 39(2), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2016.1198598
Sadenova, A., Denissova, O., Kozlova, M., Rakhimova, S., Gola, A., & Suieubayeva, S. (2025). Structural equation modeling (SEM) in Jamovi: An example of analyzing the impact of factors on the innovation activity of enterprises. Applied Computer Science, 21(1), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.35784/acs_7037
Schultz, C. S. & McKeown, J. K. (2018). Introduction to the special issue: Toward “digital leisure studies”. Leisure Sciences, 40(4): 223-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2018.1441768
Schumacker, E. ve Lomax, G. (2016). A Beginner’s Guide To Structural Equation Modelling. (4th Edt). New York: Psychology Press.
Seligman, M. (2011). Flourish. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Seligman, M. E. P. & Csikszentmihalyi, M., (2000). Positive psychology: an introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_18
Shao, Y., Wu, J., Xu, W., & Zhang, C. (2024). The impact of digital technology use on adolescents’ subjective well-being: The serial mediating role of flow and learning engagement. Medicine, 103(43), e40123. https://doiorg/10.1097/MD.0000000000040123
Sharaievska, I. (2017). Updating the family operating system: A literature review of information communication technology and family leisure. Leisure Sciences, 39(5), 400-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2017.1333058
Simsek, K. Y. (2025). Leisure time internet usage habits: generational and country comparison. Managing Sport and Leisure, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2025.2466457
Sintas, J. L., De Francisco, L. R., & Álvarez, E. G. (2015). The nature of leisure revisited: An interpretation of digital leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 47(1), 79-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2015.11950352
Sintas, J. L., Rojas de Francisco, L., & García-Álvarez, E. (2017). Home-based digital leisure: Doing the same leisure activities, but digital. Cogent Social Sciences, 3(1), 1309741. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1309741
Soper, D. S. (2024). A-priori sample size calculator for structural equation models [Software]. https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc
Spracklen, K. (2015). Digital leisure, the internet and popular culture: Communities and identities in a digital age. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stefanica, V., Ceylan, H.İ., Mihailescu, L. (2025). Impact of CrossFit intervention on mental health and well-being among first-year law students. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 12, 971. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05311-y
Stollfuß, S. (2020). Communitainment on Instagram: Fitness content and community-driven communication as social media entertainment. SAGE Open, 10(2):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/215824402091953
Syamsudin, S., Setyawati, H., Kristiyanto, A., Pramono, H., Wasa, C., & Yambedoan, T. (2025). Analysis of the relationship between traditional sports integration in the digital age: bridging cultural preservation and modern innovation in Inland Papua. Retos, 70, 1182-1205. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v70.117183
Takatalo, J., Häkkinen, J., & Nyman, G. (2015). Understanding presence, involvement, and flow in digital games. In Game user experience evaluation (pp. 87-111). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Tao, H., Zhou, Q., Tian, D., & Zhu, L. (2022). The effect of leisure involvement on place attachment: Flow experience as mediating role. Land, 11(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020151
Telef, B. B. (2013). Psikolojik İyi Oluş Ölçeği: Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(3), 374-384.
Tian, H., Zhou, W., Qiu, Y., & Zou, Z. (2022). The role of recreation specialization and self-efficacy on life satisfaction: the mediating effect of flow experience. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3243.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerhp19063243
Tiilikainen, S. (2013). At home with entertainment: changing uses, places and meanings of digital entertainment in family leisure. (Master’s thesis), Helsinki: Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki.
Tse, D. C., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2021). Living well by “flowing’well: The indirect effect of autotelic personality on well-being through flow experience. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 16(3), 310-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1716055
Twenge, J. M. (2019). More time on technology, less happiness? Associations between digital-media use and psychological well-being. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 372-379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419838244
Wang, J., & Tian, H. (2024). Serious leisure and successful aging among elderly air volleyball players: examining the mediating role of social support and flow experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1403373. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1403373
Zhang, C., Tang, L. & Liu, Z. How social media usage affects psychological and subjective well-being: testing a moderated mediation model. BMC Psychology 11, 286 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01311-2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Batuhan Er, Recep Cengiz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.
